customer-research

作者: coreyhaines31

當使用者想要進行、分析或綜合客戶研究時使用。適用於使用者提及「客戶研究」、「ICP研究」、「與客戶交談」、「分析逐字稿」、「客戶訪談」、「問卷分析」、「客服工單分析」、「客戶之聲」、「VOC」、「建立人物誌」、「客戶人物誌」、「待辦事項」、「JTBD」、「客戶說了什麼」、「客戶正在困擾什麼」、「Reddit挖掘」、「G2評論」、「評論挖掘」、「數位水坑」、「社群...」等情境。

npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill customer-research

Customer Research

You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.

Before Starting

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context to skip questions already answered.


Two Modes of Research

Mode 1: Analyze Existing Assets

You have raw research material (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets). Your job is to extract signal.

Mode 2: Go Find Research

You need to gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites). Your job is to know where to look and what to extract.

Most engagements combine both. Establish which mode applies before proceeding.


Mode 1: Analyzing Existing Research Assets

Asset Types

Customer interview / sales call transcripts

  • Extract: pains, triggers, desired outcomes, language used, objections, alternatives considered
  • Look for: the moment they decided to look for a solution, what they tried before, what success looks like to them

Survey results

  • Segment responses by customer tier, use case, or tenure before drawing conclusions
  • Flag: what open-ended answers say vs. what multiple-choice answers say (they often conflict)
  • Identify: the 20% of responses that contain the most useful signal

Customer support conversations

  • Mine for: recurring complaints, confusion points, feature requests, and "I wish it could…" language
  • Categorize tickets before analyzing — don't treat all tickets as equal signal
  • Separate bugs from confusion from missing features from expectation mismatches

Win/loss interviews and churned customer notes

  • Wins: what tipped the decision? What almost made them choose a competitor?
  • Losses and churn: was it price, features, fit, timing, or something else?
  • Segment by reason — don't average across different churn causes

NPS responses

  • Passives and detractors are higher signal than promoters for improvement work
  • Pair scores with verbatims — a 9 with a specific complaint beats a 10 with no comment

Extraction Framework

For each asset, extract:

  1. Jobs to Be Done — what outcome is the customer trying to achieve?

    • Functional job: the task itself
    • Emotional job: how they want to feel
    • Social job: how they want to be perceived
  2. Pain Points — what's frustrating, broken, or inadequate about their current situation?

    • Prioritize pains mentioned unprompted and with emotional language
  3. Trigger Events — what changed that made them seek a solution?

    • Common triggers: team growth, new hire, missed target, embarrassing incident, competitor doing something
  4. Desired Outcomes — what does success look like in their words?

    • Capture exact quotes, not paraphrases
  5. Language and Vocabulary — exact words and phrases customers use

    • This is gold for copy. "We were drowning in spreadsheets" > "manual process inefficiency"
  6. Alternatives Considered — what else did they look at or try?

    • Includes doing nothing, hiring someone, or building internally

Synthesis Steps

After extracting from individual assets:

  1. Cluster by theme — group similar pains, outcomes, and triggers across assets
  2. Frequency + intensity scoring — how often does a theme appear, and how strongly is it felt?
  3. Segment by customer profile — do patterns differ by company size, role, use case, or tenure?
  4. Identify the "money quotes" — 5-10 verbatim quotes that best represent each theme
  5. Flag contradictions — where do customers say one thing but do another?

Research Quality Guardrails

Label every insight with a confidence level before presenting it:

ConfidenceCriteria
HighTheme appears in 3+ independent sources; mentioned unprompted; consistent across segments
MediumTheme appears in 2 sources, or only prompted, or limited to one segment
LowSingle source; could be an outlier; needs validation

Recency window: Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily. Markets shift — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer.

Sample bias checks:

  • Online reviewers skew toward power users and people with strong opinions
  • Support tickets skew toward problems, not value
  • Reddit skews technical and skeptical vs. mainstream buyers
  • Factor this in when drawing conclusions about "all customers"

Minimum viable sample: Don't build personas or draw messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment.


Mode 2: Digital Watering Hole Research

Online communities are where customers speak without a filter. The goal is to find authentic, unmoderated language about the problem space.

Where to Look

Choose sources based on your ICP type — then read references/source-guides.md for detailed playbooks, search operators, and per-platform extraction tips.

ICP TypePrimary Sources
B2B SaaS / technical buyersReddit (role-specific subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, SparkToro
SMB / foundersReddit (r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness), Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups, SparkToro
Developer / DevOpsr/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord servers
B2C / consumerApp store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby/lifestyle subs, YouTube comments, TikTok/Instagram comments
EnterpriseLinkedIn, industry analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings, SparkToro

Quick decision guide:

  • Have a product category? → Start with G2/Capterra reviews (yours + competitors)
  • Need to know where your audience spends time? → SparkToro (reveals podcasts, YouTube, subreddits, websites, social accounts)
  • Need raw language? → Reddit and YouTube comments
  • Need trigger events? → LinkedIn posts, job postings, Hacker News "Ask HN" threads
  • Need competitive intel? → Competitor 4-star reviews on G2; Product Hunt discussions; SparkToro competitor audience analysis

What to Extract from Each Source

For every piece of content you find:

FieldWhat to Capture
SourcePlatform, thread URL, date
Verbatim quoteExact words — don't paraphrase
ContextWhat prompted the comment?
SentimentPositive / negative / neutral / frustrated
Theme tagPain / trigger / outcome / alternative / language
Customer profile signalsRole, company size, industry hints from the post

Research Synthesis Template

After gathering from multiple sources, synthesize into:

## Top Themes (ranked by frequency × intensity)

### Theme 1: [Name]
**Summary**: [1-2 sentences]
**Frequency**: Appeared in X of Y sources
**Intensity**: High / Medium / Low (based on emotional language used)
**Representative quotes**:
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
**Implications**: What this means for messaging / product / positioning

### Theme 2: ...

Persona Generation

Personas should be built from research, not invented. Don't create a persona until you have at least 5-10 data points (interviews, reviews, or community posts) from a consistent segment.

Persona Structure

## [Persona Name] — [Role/Title]

**Profile**
- Title range: [e.g., "Marketing Manager to VP of Marketing"]
- Company size: [e.g., "50–500 employees, Series A–C SaaS"]
- Industry: [if narrow]
- Reports to: [who]
- Team size managed: [if relevant]

**Primary Job to Be Done**
[One sentence: what outcome are they trying to achieve in their role?]

**Trigger Events**
What causes them to start looking for a solution like yours?
- [trigger 1]
- [trigger 2]

**Top Pains**
1. [Pain — in their words if possible]
2. [Pain]
3. [Pain]

**Desired Outcomes**
- [What success looks like to them]
- [How they measure it]
- [How it makes them look to their boss/team]

**Objections and Fears**
- [What makes them hesitate to buy or switch]

**Alternatives They Consider**
- [Competitor, DIY, do nothing, hire someone]

**Key Vocabulary**
Words and phrases they actually use (sourced from research):
- "[phrase]"
- "[phrase]"

**How to Reach Them**
- Channels: [where they spend time]
- Content they consume: [formats, topics]
- Influencers/communities they trust: [specific names if known]

Persona Anti-Patterns

  • Don't name them cutely ("Marketing Mary") unless your team finds it helpful — it's often a distraction
  • Don't average across segments — a persona that represents everyone represents no one
  • Don't invent details — if you don't have data on something, leave it blank rather than filling it in
  • Revisit quarterly — personas decay as your market and product evolve

Deliverable Formats

Depending on what the user needs, offer:

  1. Research synthesis report — themes, quotes, patterns, and implications
  2. VOC quote bank — organized verbatim quotes by theme, for use in copy
  3. Persona document — 1-3 personas built from the research
  4. Jobs-to-be-done map — functional, emotional, and social jobs by segment
  5. Competitive intelligence summary — what customers say about competitors vs. you
  6. Research gap analysis — what you still don't know and how to find it

Ask the user which deliverable(s) they need before generating output.


Questions to Ask Before Proceeding

If context is unclear:

  1. What's the goal? Improve messaging? Build personas? Find product gaps? Understand churn?
  2. What do you already have? (transcripts, surveys, tickets, G2 reviews, nothing)
  3. Who is the target segment? (all customers, a specific tier, churned users, prospects who didn't buy)
  4. What's your product? (if not in the product marketing context file)
  5. What do you want delivered? (synthesis report, persona, quote bank, competitive intel)

Don't ask all five at once — lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed.


Related Skills

When to hand offSkill
Writing copy informed by the researchcopywriting
Optimizing a page using VOC insightscro
Building a competitor comparison pagecompetitors
Creating a churn prevention strategy from churn researchchurn-prevention
Planning paid ads informed by researchads
Writing cold email using research on pain/triggercold-email
Translating customer research into an ICP for outboundprospecting
Planning content based on discovered topicscontent-strategy
Rolling research into a comprehensive marketing planmarketing-plan

來自 coreyhaines31 的更多技能

copywriting
coreyhaines31
當用戶想要撰寫、改寫或優化任何頁面的行銷文案時——包括首頁、登陸頁、定價頁、功能頁、關於我們頁或產品頁。也適用於用戶說「為此撰寫文案」、「改進這段文案」、「重寫這個頁面」、「行銷文案」、「標題協助」、「CTA文案」、「價值主張」、「標語」、「副標題」、「英雄區文案」、「首屏內容」、「這段文案不夠有力」、「讓它更具吸引力」或「幫我描述產品」時。使用此...
marketingcreativecommunication
seo-audit
coreyhaines31
當用戶想要審核、檢視或診斷其網站的SEO問題時使用。也適用於用戶提及「SEO審核」、「技術SEO」、「為什麼我沒有排名」、「SEO問題」、「頁面SEO」、「中繼標籤審查」、「SEO健康檢查」、「我的流量下降了」、「排名消失」、「沒有出現在Google上」、「網站沒有排名」、「Google更新影響了我」、「頁面速度」、「核心網頁指標」、「爬蟲錯誤」或「索引問題」等情況。即使用戶只是模糊地說「我的SEO很糟」或「幫幫我...」也適用。
marketingresearchdata-analysis
marketing-psychology
coreyhaines31
當使用者希望將心理學原理、心智模型或行為科學應用於行銷時使用。也適用於使用者提及「心理學」、「心智模型」、「認知偏誤」、「說服」、「行為科學」、「人們為何購買」、「決策制定」、「消費者行為」、「定錨效應」、「社會證明」、「稀缺性」、「損失趨避」、「框架效應」或「助推」等詞彙。每當有人想理解或運用行銷情境中人們的思考與決策方式時,即可使用此技能。用於應用...
marketingresearch
content-strategy
coreyhaines31
當使用者想要規劃內容策略、決定要創作什麼內容,或找出要涵蓋哪些主題時使用。也適用於使用者提及「內容策略」、「我該寫什麼」、「內容點子」、「部落格策略」、「主題集群」、「內容規劃」、「編輯日曆」、「內容行銷」、「內容路線圖」、「我該創作什麼內容」、「部落格主題」、「內容支柱」或「我不知道該寫什麼」時。每當有人需要協助決定該創作什麼內容時,請使用此技能。
marketingresearchcreative
ai-seo
coreyhaines31
當使用者想要針對AI搜尋引擎優化內容、被大型語言模型引用,或出現在AI生成的回答中時使用。也適用於使用者提及「AI SEO」、「AEO」、「GEO」、「LLMO」、「答案引擎優化」、「生成式引擎優化」、「大型語言模型優化」、「AI概覽」、「針對ChatGPT優化」、「針對Perplexity優化」、「AI引用」、「AI可見度」、「零點擊搜尋」、「如何出現在AI回答中」、「大型語言模型提及」或「針對Claude/Gemini優化」等情況。每當有人...
marketingresearch
programmatic-seo
coreyhaines31
當使用者希望透過模板與資料大規模建立SEO導向頁面時使用。也適用於使用者提及「程式化SEO」、「模板頁面」、「大規模頁面」、「目錄頁面」、「地區頁面」、「[關鍵字] + [城市] 頁面」、「比較頁面」、「整合頁面」、「為SEO建立大量頁面」、「pSEO」、「生成100個頁面」、「資料驅動頁面」或「模板化登陸頁面」時。每當有人想針對不同關鍵字或地點建立大量相似頁面時使用。用於...
marketingdata-analysisweb-scraping
marketing-ideas
coreyhaines31
當使用者需要針對其SaaS或軟體產品的行銷點子、靈感或策略時使用。也適用於使用者提出「行銷點子」、「成長點子」、「如何行銷」、「行銷策略」、「行銷戰術」、「推廣方式」、「成長想法」、「還有什麼可以嘗試」、「我不知道該如何行銷這個」、「腦力激盪行銷」或「我該做什麼行銷」等需求時。每當有人卡住或尋找成長靈感時,以此作為起點。針對特定...
marketing
copy-editing
coreyhaines31
當使用者想要編輯、審閱或改善現有的行銷文案,或更新過時的內容時使用。也適用於使用者提及「編輯這段文案」、「審閱我的文案」、「文案反饋」、「校對」、「潤飾這段內容」、「讓它更好」、「文案檢查」、「精簡這段」、「讀起來不順」、「清理這段文字」、「太囉嗦」、「強化訊息」、「更新這段內容」、「更新這個頁面」、「這段內容已過時」或「內容審查」等情況。當使用者已有文案並希望進行處理時使用。
documentcommunicationmarketing