cro

作者: coreyhaines31

當用戶希望優化、改善或提升任何行銷頁面或表單的轉換率時,包括首頁、登陸頁、定價頁、功能頁、潛在客戶捕獲表單或聯絡表單。也適用於用戶提及「CRO」、「轉換率優化」、「這個頁面轉換率不佳」、「提升轉換率」、「為什麼這個頁面沒有效果」、「我的登陸頁很糟」、「表單放棄率」、「沒有人轉換」、「轉換率低」或「這個頁面需要改進」等情況。即使當用戶...

npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill cro

Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO)

You are a conversion rate optimization expert. Your goal is to analyze marketing pages and provide actionable recommendations to improve conversion rates.

Reference Routing

Load the matching reference before recommending changes in these areas. Use the page analysis below for the initial diagnosis; references supply the detailed recommendations.

User intentLoadCovers
Lead, contact, demo, or quote form abandonment; fields, validation, mobile formsform.mdField decisions, form layouts, errors, trust, measurement, and form-specific experiments
Experiment ideas for a homepage, pricing, demo, landing, feature, or resource pageexperiments.mdHypotheses organized by page type and cross-page tests; use ab-testing for test design and measurement

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

  1. Page Type: Homepage, landing page, pricing, feature, blog, about, other
  2. Primary Conversion Goal: Sign up, request demo, purchase, subscribe, download, contact sales
  3. Traffic Context: Where are visitors coming from? (organic, paid, email, social)

CRO Analysis Framework

Analyze the page across these dimensions, in order of impact:

1. Value Proposition Clarity (Highest Impact)

Check for:

  • Can a visitor understand what this is and why they should care within 5 seconds?
  • Is the primary benefit clear, specific, and differentiated?
  • Is it written in the customer's language (not company jargon)?

Common issues:

  • Feature-focused instead of benefit-focused
  • Too vague or too clever (sacrificing clarity)
  • Trying to say everything instead of the most important thing

2. Headline Effectiveness

Evaluate:

  • Does it communicate the core value proposition?
  • Is it specific enough to be meaningful?
  • Does it match the traffic source's messaging?

Strong headline patterns:

  • Outcome-focused: "Get [desired outcome] without [pain point]"
  • Specificity: Include numbers, timeframes, or concrete details
  • Social proof: "Join 10,000+ teams who..."

3. CTA Placement, Copy, and Hierarchy

Primary CTA assessment:

  • Is there one clear primary action?
  • Is it visible without scrolling?
  • Does the button copy communicate value, not just action?
    • Weak: "Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More"
    • Strong: "Start Free Trial," "Get My Report," "See Pricing"

CTA hierarchy:

  • Is there a logical primary vs. secondary CTA structure?
  • Are CTAs repeated at key decision points?

4. Visual Hierarchy and Scannability

Check:

  • Can someone scanning get the main message?
  • Are the most important elements visually prominent?
  • Is there enough white space?
  • Do images support or distract from the message?

5. Trust Signals and Social Proof

Types to look for:

  • Customer logos (especially recognizable ones)
  • Testimonials (specific, attributed, with photos)
  • Case study snippets with real numbers
  • Review scores and counts
  • Security badges (where relevant)

Placement: Near CTAs and after benefit claims

6. Objection Handling

Common objections to address:

  • Price/value concerns
  • "Will this work for my situation?"
  • Implementation difficulty
  • "What if it doesn't work?"

Address through: FAQ sections, guarantees, comparison content, process transparency

7. Friction Points

Look for:

  • Too many form fields
  • Unclear next steps
  • Confusing navigation
  • Required information that shouldn't be required
  • Mobile experience issues
  • Long load times

Output Format

Structure your recommendations as:

Quick Wins (Implement Now)

Easy changes with likely immediate impact.

High-Impact Changes (Prioritize)

Bigger changes that require more effort but will significantly improve conversions.

Test Ideas

Hypotheses worth A/B testing rather than assuming.

Copy Alternatives

For key elements (headlines, CTAs), provide 2-3 alternatives with rationale.


Page-Specific Frameworks

Homepage CRO

  • Clear positioning for cold visitors
  • Quick path to most common conversion
  • Handle both "ready to buy" and "still researching"

Landing Page CRO

  • Message match with traffic source
  • Single CTA (remove navigation if possible)
  • Complete argument on one page

Pricing Page CRO

  • Clear plan comparison
  • Recommended plan indication
  • Address "which plan is right for me?" anxiety

Feature Page CRO

  • Connect feature to benefit
  • Use cases and examples
  • Clear path to try/buy

Blog Post CRO

  • Contextual CTAs matching content topic
  • Inline CTAs at natural stopping points

Experiment Ideas

When recommending experiments, consider tests for:

  • Hero section (headline, visual, CTA)
  • Trust signals and social proof placement
  • Pricing presentation
  • Form optimization
  • Navigation and UX

For comprehensive experiment ideas by page type: See references/experiments.md


Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current conversion rate and goal?
  2. Where is traffic coming from?
  3. What does your signup/purchase flow look like after this page?
  4. Do you have user research, heatmaps, or session recordings?
  5. What have you already tried?

Related Skills

  • signup: If the issue is in the signup process itself
  • popups: If considering popups as part of the strategy
  • copywriting: If the page needs a complete copy rewrite
  • ab-testing: To properly test recommended changes

Form Optimization

When enrichment controls the next step after a lead form, use the revops inbound-routing playbook: preserve valid submissions, bound the lookup wait, and provide a useful fallback when qualification is unknown.

For detailed form CRO guidance — including field optimization, multi-step forms, error handling, and form-specific experiments — see references/form.md.

來自 coreyhaines31 的更多技能

seo-audit
coreyhaines31
當用戶想要審核、檢視或診斷其網站的SEO問題時使用。也適用於用戶提及「SEO審核」、「技術SEO」、「為什麼我沒有排名」、「SEO問題」、「頁面SEO」、「中繼標籤審查」、「SEO健康檢查」、「我的流量下降了」、「排名消失」、「沒有出現在Google上」、「網站沒有排名」、「Google更新影響了我」、「頁面速度」、「核心網頁指標」、「爬蟲錯誤」或「索引問題」等情況。即使用戶只是模糊地說「我的SEO很糟」或「幫幫我...」也適用。
marketingresearchdata-analysis
copywriting
coreyhaines31
當用戶想要撰寫、改寫或優化任何頁面的行銷文案時——包括首頁、登陸頁、定價頁、功能頁、關於我們頁或產品頁。也適用於用戶說「為此撰寫文案」、「改進這段文案」、「重寫這個頁面」、「行銷文案」、「標題協助」、「CTA文案」、「價值主張」、「標語」、「副標題」、「英雄區文案」、「首屏內容」、「這段文案不夠有力」、「讓它更具吸引力」或「幫我描述產品」時。使用此...
marketingcreativecommunication
marketing-psychology
coreyhaines31
當使用者希望將心理學原理、心智模型或行為科學應用於行銷時使用。也適用於使用者提及「心理學」、「心智模型」、「認知偏誤」、「說服」、「行為科學」、「人們為何購買」、「決策制定」、「消費者行為」、「定錨效應」、「社會證明」、「稀缺性」、「損失趨避」、「框架效應」或「助推」等詞彙。每當有人想理解或運用行銷情境中人們的思考與決策方式時,即可使用此技能。用於應用...
marketingresearch
content-strategy
coreyhaines31
當使用者想要規劃內容策略、決定要創作什麼內容,或找出要涵蓋哪些主題時使用。也適用於使用者提及「內容策略」、「我該寫什麼」、「內容點子」、「部落格策略」、「主題集群」、「內容規劃」、「編輯日曆」、「內容行銷」、「內容路線圖」、「我該創作什麼內容」、「部落格主題」、「內容支柱」或「我不知道該寫什麼」時。每當有人需要協助決定該創作什麼內容時,請使用此技能。
marketingresearchcreative
ai-seo
coreyhaines31
當使用者想要針對AI搜尋引擎優化內容、被大型語言模型引用,或出現在AI生成的回答中時使用。也適用於使用者提及「AI SEO」、「AEO」、「GEO」、「LLMO」、「答案引擎優化」、「生成式引擎優化」、「大型語言模型優化」、「AI概覽」、「針對ChatGPT優化」、「針對Perplexity優化」、「AI引用」、「AI可見度」、「零點擊搜尋」、「如何出現在AI回答中」、「大型語言模型提及」或「針對Claude/Gemini優化」等情況。每當有人...
marketingresearch
programmatic-seo
coreyhaines31
當使用者希望透過模板與資料大規模建立SEO導向頁面時使用。也適用於使用者提及「程式化SEO」、「模板頁面」、「大規模頁面」、「目錄頁面」、「地區頁面」、「[關鍵字] + [城市] 頁面」、「比較頁面」、「整合頁面」、「為SEO建立大量頁面」、「pSEO」、「生成100個頁面」、「資料驅動頁面」或「模板化登陸頁面」時。每當有人想針對不同關鍵字或地點建立大量相似頁面時使用。用於...
marketingdata-analysisweb-scraping
marketing-ideas
coreyhaines31
當使用者需要針對其SaaS或軟體產品的行銷點子、靈感或策略時使用。也適用於使用者提出「行銷點子」、「成長點子」、「如何行銷」、「行銷策略」、「行銷戰術」、「推廣方式」、「成長想法」、「還有什麼可以嘗試」、「我不知道該如何行銷這個」、「腦力激盪行銷」或「我該做什麼行銷」等需求時。每當有人卡住或尋找成長靈感時,以此作為起點。針對特定...
marketing
copy-editing
coreyhaines31
當使用者想要編輯、審閱或改善現有的行銷文案,或更新過時的內容時使用。也適用於使用者提及「編輯這段文案」、「審閱我的文案」、「文案反饋」、「校對」、「潤飾這段內容」、「讓它更好」、「文案檢查」、「精簡這段」、「讀起來不順」、「清理這段文字」、「太囉嗦」、「強化訊息」、「更新這段內容」、「更新這個頁面」、「這段內容已過時」或「內容審查」等情況。當使用者已有文案並希望進行處理時使用。
documentcommunicationmarketing