competitors

作者: coreyhaines31

當用戶想要建立競爭對手比較或替代頁面以用於SEO和銷售支援時使用。也適用於用戶提及「替代頁面」、「vs頁面」、「競爭對手比較」、「比較頁面」、「[產品] vs [產品]」、「[產品]替代方案」、「競爭性登陸頁面」、「我們與X相比如何」、「戰術卡」或「競爭對手拆解」時。用於任何將您的產品與競爭對手進行定位的內容。涵蓋四種格式:單一替代方案、多種替代方案……

npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill competitors

Competitor & Alternative Pages

You are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before creating competitor pages, understand:

  1. Your Product

    • Core value proposition
    • Key differentiators
    • Ideal customer profile
    • Pricing model
    • Strengths and honest weaknesses
  2. Competitive Landscape

    • Direct competitors
    • Indirect/adjacent competitors
    • Market positioning of each
    • Search volume for competitor terms
  3. Goals

    • SEO traffic capture
    • Sales enablement
    • Conversion from competitor users
    • Brand positioning

Core Principles

1. Honesty Builds Trust

  • Acknowledge competitor strengths
  • Be accurate about your limitations
  • Don't misrepresent competitor features
  • Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims

2. Depth Over Surface

  • Go beyond feature checklists
  • Explain why differences matter
  • Include use cases and scenarios
  • Show, don't just tell

3. Help Them Decide

  • Different tools fit different needs
  • Be clear about who you're best for
  • Be clear about who competitor is best for
  • Reduce evaluation friction

4. Modular Content Architecture

  • Competitor data should be centralized
  • Updates propagate to all pages
  • Single source of truth per competitor

Page Formats

Format 1: [Competitor] Alternative (Singular)

Search intent: User is actively looking to switch from a specific competitor

URL pattern: /alternatives/[competitor] or /[competitor]-alternative

Target keywords: "[Competitor] alternative", "alternative to [Competitor]", "switch from [Competitor]"

Page structure:

  1. Why people look for alternatives (validate their pain)
  2. Summary: You as the alternative (quick positioning)
  3. Detailed comparison (features, service, pricing)
  4. Who should switch (and who shouldn't)
  5. Migration path
  6. Social proof from switchers
  7. CTA

Format 2: [Competitor] Alternatives (Plural)

Search intent: User is researching options, earlier in journey

URL pattern: /alternatives/[competitor]-alternatives

Target keywords: "[Competitor] alternatives", "best [Competitor] alternatives", "tools like [Competitor]"

Page structure:

  1. Why people look for alternatives (common pain points)
  2. What to look for in an alternative (criteria framework)
  3. List of alternatives (you first, but include real options)
  4. Comparison table (summary)
  5. Detailed breakdown of each alternative
  6. Recommendation by use case
  7. CTA

Important: Include 4-7 real alternatives. Being genuinely helpful builds trust and ranks better.


Format 3: You vs [Competitor]

Search intent: User is directly comparing you to a specific competitor

URL pattern: /vs/[competitor] or /compare/[you]-vs-[competitor]

Target keywords: "[You] vs [Competitor]", "[Competitor] vs [You]"

Page structure:

  1. TL;DR summary (key differences in 2-3 sentences)
  2. At-a-glance comparison table
  3. Detailed comparison by category (Features, Pricing, Support, Ease of use, Integrations)
  4. Who [You] is best for
  5. Who [Competitor] is best for (be honest)
  6. What customers say (testimonials from switchers)
  7. Migration support
  8. CTA

Format 4: [Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]

Search intent: User comparing two competitors (not you directly)

URL pattern: /compare/[competitor-a]-vs-[competitor-b]

Page structure:

  1. Overview of both products
  2. Comparison by category
  3. Who each is best for
  4. The third option (introduce yourself)
  5. Comparison table (all three)
  6. CTA

Why this works: Captures search traffic for competitor terms, positions you as knowledgeable.


Essential Sections

TL;DR Summary

Start every page with a quick summary for scanners—key differences in 2-3 sentences.

Paragraph Comparisons

Go beyond tables. For each dimension, write a paragraph explaining the differences and when each matters.

Feature Comparison

For each category: describe how each handles it, list strengths and limitations, give bottom line recommendation.

Pricing Comparison

Include tier-by-tier comparison, what's included, hidden costs, and total cost calculation for sample team size.

Who It's For

Be explicit about ideal customer for each option. Honest recommendations build trust.

Migration Section

Cover what transfers, what needs reconfiguration, support offered, and quotes from customers who switched.

For detailed templates: See references/templates.md


Content Architecture

Centralized Competitor Data

Create a single source of truth for each competitor with:

  • Positioning and target audience
  • Pricing (all tiers)
  • Feature ratings
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Best for / not ideal for
  • Common complaints (from reviews)
  • Migration notes

For data structure and examples: See references/content-architecture.md


Research Process

Deep Competitor Research

For each competitor, gather:

  1. Product research: Sign up, use it, document features/UX/limitations
  2. Pricing research: Current pricing, what's included, hidden costs
  3. Review mining: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius for common praise/complaint themes
  4. Customer feedback: Talk to customers who switched (both directions)
  5. Content research: Their positioning, their comparison pages, their changelog

Ongoing Updates

  • Quarterly: Verify pricing, check for major feature changes
  • When notified: Customer mentions competitor change
  • Annually: Full refresh of all competitor data

SEO Considerations

Keyword Targeting

FormatPrimary Keywords
Alternative (singular)[Competitor] alternative, alternative to [Competitor]
Alternatives (plural)[Competitor] alternatives, best [Competitor] alternatives
You vs Competitor[You] vs [Competitor], [Competitor] vs [You]
Competitor vs Competitor[A] vs [B], [B] vs [A]

Internal Linking

  • Link between related competitor pages
  • Link from feature pages to relevant comparisons
  • Create hub page linking to all competitor content

Schema Markup

Consider FAQ schema for common questions like "What is the best alternative to [Competitor]?"


Output Format

Competitor Data File

Complete competitor profile in YAML format for use across all comparison pages.

Page Content

For each page: URL, meta tags, full page copy organized by section, comparison tables, CTAs.

Page Set Plan

Recommended pages to create with priority order based on search volume.


Task-Specific Questions

  1. What are common reasons people switch to you?
  2. Do you have customer quotes about switching?
  3. What's your pricing vs. competitors?
  4. Do you offer migration support?

Related Skills

  • programmatic-seo: For building competitor pages at scale
  • copywriting: For writing compelling comparison copy
  • seo-audit: For optimizing competitor pages
  • schema: For FAQ and comparison schema
  • sales-enablement: For internal sales collateral, decks, and objection docs

來自 coreyhaines31 的更多技能

copywriting
coreyhaines31
當用戶想要撰寫、改寫或優化任何頁面的行銷文案時——包括首頁、登陸頁、定價頁、功能頁、關於我們頁或產品頁。也適用於用戶說「為此撰寫文案」、「改進這段文案」、「重寫這個頁面」、「行銷文案」、「標題協助」、「CTA文案」、「價值主張」、「標語」、「副標題」、「英雄區文案」、「首屏內容」、「這段文案不夠有力」、「讓它更具吸引力」或「幫我描述產品」時。使用此...
marketingcreativecommunication
seo-audit
coreyhaines31
當用戶想要審核、檢視或診斷其網站的SEO問題時使用。也適用於用戶提及「SEO審核」、「技術SEO」、「為什麼我沒有排名」、「SEO問題」、「頁面SEO」、「中繼標籤審查」、「SEO健康檢查」、「我的流量下降了」、「排名消失」、「沒有出現在Google上」、「網站沒有排名」、「Google更新影響了我」、「頁面速度」、「核心網頁指標」、「爬蟲錯誤」或「索引問題」等情況。即使用戶只是模糊地說「我的SEO很糟」或「幫幫我...」也適用。
marketingresearchdata-analysis
marketing-psychology
coreyhaines31
當使用者希望將心理學原理、心智模型或行為科學應用於行銷時使用。也適用於使用者提及「心理學」、「心智模型」、「認知偏誤」、「說服」、「行為科學」、「人們為何購買」、「決策制定」、「消費者行為」、「定錨效應」、「社會證明」、「稀缺性」、「損失趨避」、「框架效應」或「助推」等詞彙。每當有人想理解或運用行銷情境中人們的思考與決策方式時,即可使用此技能。用於應用...
marketingresearch
content-strategy
coreyhaines31
當使用者想要規劃內容策略、決定要創作什麼內容,或找出要涵蓋哪些主題時使用。也適用於使用者提及「內容策略」、「我該寫什麼」、「內容點子」、「部落格策略」、「主題集群」、「內容規劃」、「編輯日曆」、「內容行銷」、「內容路線圖」、「我該創作什麼內容」、「部落格主題」、「內容支柱」或「我不知道該寫什麼」時。每當有人需要協助決定該創作什麼內容時,請使用此技能。
marketingresearchcreative
ai-seo
coreyhaines31
當使用者想要針對AI搜尋引擎優化內容、被大型語言模型引用,或出現在AI生成的回答中時使用。也適用於使用者提及「AI SEO」、「AEO」、「GEO」、「LLMO」、「答案引擎優化」、「生成式引擎優化」、「大型語言模型優化」、「AI概覽」、「針對ChatGPT優化」、「針對Perplexity優化」、「AI引用」、「AI可見度」、「零點擊搜尋」、「如何出現在AI回答中」、「大型語言模型提及」或「針對Claude/Gemini優化」等情況。每當有人...
marketingresearch
programmatic-seo
coreyhaines31
當使用者希望透過模板與資料大規模建立SEO導向頁面時使用。也適用於使用者提及「程式化SEO」、「模板頁面」、「大規模頁面」、「目錄頁面」、「地區頁面」、「[關鍵字] + [城市] 頁面」、「比較頁面」、「整合頁面」、「為SEO建立大量頁面」、「pSEO」、「生成100個頁面」、「資料驅動頁面」或「模板化登陸頁面」時。每當有人想針對不同關鍵字或地點建立大量相似頁面時使用。用於...
marketingdata-analysisweb-scraping
marketing-ideas
coreyhaines31
當使用者需要針對其SaaS或軟體產品的行銷點子、靈感或策略時使用。也適用於使用者提出「行銷點子」、「成長點子」、「如何行銷」、「行銷策略」、「行銷戰術」、「推廣方式」、「成長想法」、「還有什麼可以嘗試」、「我不知道該如何行銷這個」、「腦力激盪行銷」或「我該做什麼行銷」等需求時。每當有人卡住或尋找成長靈感時,以此作為起點。針對特定...
marketing
copy-editing
coreyhaines31
當使用者想要編輯、審閱或改善現有的行銷文案,或更新過時的內容時使用。也適用於使用者提及「編輯這段文案」、「審閱我的文案」、「文案反饋」、「校對」、「潤飾這段內容」、「讓它更好」、「文案檢查」、「精簡這段」、「讀起來不順」、「清理這段文字」、「太囉嗦」、「強化訊息」、「更新這段內容」、「更新這個頁面」、「這段內容已過時」或「內容審查」等情況。當使用者已有文案並希望進行處理時使用。
documentcommunicationmarketing