code-review

作者: contentstack

PR 檢查清單——涵蓋 API 穩定性、文件、錯誤、相容性、依賴/SCA、測試、供應商代碼;等級為 Blocker/Major/Minor。

npx skills add https://github.com/contentstack/contentstack-utils-swift --skill code-review

Code review – Contentstack Utils Swift

When to use

  • Reviewing a PR, self-review before submit, or automated review prompts.

Instructions

Work through the checklist below. Optionally tag findings: Blocker, Major, Minor.

API design and stability

  • Public API: New or changed public / open types in Sources/ContentstackUtils/ are necessary, semver-conscious, and documented (README.md / CHANGELOG.md when user-visible).
  • Backward compatibility: No breaking changes unless explicitly justified (e.g. major version). Prefer additive behavior and default Option() paths.
  • Naming: Matches existing Utils and RTE terminology (ContentstackUtils, Option, Node, GQL, etc.).

Error handling and robustness

  • Errors: New throws paths use clear domain types (e.g. VariantUtilityError); callers can distinguish invalid input from parsing failures where relevant.
  • Optionals: No force-unwraps on public code paths; document preconditions for non-optional parameters.
  • RTE JSON: Decoding and HTML traversal stay tolerant of documented stack payload shapes; embedded-item regressions are called out.

Dependencies and security

  • Dependencies: Package.swift / ContentstackUtils.podspec changes are justified; versions do not introduce known vulnerabilities.
  • SCA: Address security findings (e.g. Snyk, org scanners) in the PR or via an agreed follow-up.

Testing

  • Coverage: New or modified behavior in Sources/ContentstackUtils/ has tests under Tests/ContentstackUtilsTests/ when feasible.
  • Quality: Tests are readable, deterministic, and follow naming/mocks conventions.

Vendored and native code

  • Kanna / libxml2 / Modules/: Reviewed for upstream parity, licensing, and Apple vs Linux builds.

Severity (optional)

LevelExamples
BlockerBreaking public API without approval; security issue; no tests for new code where tests are practical
MajorInconsistent errors; README examples that do not compile
MinorStyle; minor docs

Detailed review themes (from checklist sections)

  • API: Breaking public/open without semver/CHANGELOG/podspec alignment.
  • Errors: throws changes that confuse callers without a version strategy.
  • README: Examples must match real APIs (jsonToHtml overloads, GQL.jsonToHtml).
  • Dependencies: New packages in Package.swift / podspec need justification.

References

  • skills/testing/SKILL.md
  • skills/contentstack-utils/SKILL.md

來自 contentstack 的更多技能

cms-assets
contentstack
為開發人員提供有關在Contentstack中組織、交付和轉換資產的建議。涵蓋資料夾結構、Image Delivery API轉換、發佈……
cms-branches-aliases
contentstack
為開發人員提供使用 Contentstack 分支進行隔離內容開發以及使用別名實現零停機內容部署的建議。涵蓋分支策略,…
cms-data-modeling-best-practices
contentstack
引導開發人員在Contentstack中使用最簡單的可重用結構來建模內容。此技能說明何時使用內容類型、引用、全域…
cms-live-preview-visual-builder-support-assistant
contentstack
診斷並指導 Contentstack Live Preview 和 Visual Builder 的實作。追蹤預覽上下文,識別中斷的合約,並建議…
cms-releases
contentstack
指導開發人員使用 Contentstack Releases 進行協調、原子化的內容部署。涵蓋版本建立、項目管理、分階段部署等內容。
cms-roles-permissions
contentstack
為開發人員提供關於在Contentstack中設計角色、權限、團隊和Token存取權限的建議。解釋內建角色、自訂角色、權限合併等。
cms-taxonomy
contentstack
為開發人員提供關於使用 Contentstack Taxonomy 進行結構化、階層式內容分類及傳遞端篩選的建議。涵蓋 taxonomy 與 tags 的比較,…
cms-tokens-authentication
contentstack
為開發人員提供建議,協助他們為前端、後端、自動化及第三方應用程式使用情境選擇正確的Contentstack驗證方法與權杖類型。…