analyzing-git-sessions

作者: bitwarden

分析指定時間範圍或提交範圍內的 Git 提交與變更,提供結構化摘要,適用於程式碼審查、回顧會議、工作日誌或工作階段…

npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill analyzing-git-sessions

Analyzing Git Sessions

Core Responsibility

Generate structured analysis of git activity for specified timeframe or commit range, including commit history, file changes, statistics, and optional diffs.

Inputs

Accept from user:

  • Time range: "last 2 hours", "since 10am", "today", "since 2025-10-23 14:00"
  • Commit range: "abc123..def456", "HEAD~5..HEAD", "feature-branch..main"
  • Optional filters: Specific paths, authors, or file types
  • Output depth: Concise (default), Detailed, or Code Review format

Working Process

Step 1: Parse and Validate Input

  1. Determine range type:

    • Time-based: Parse relative or absolute time
    • Commit-based: Validate commit references exist
    • Branch-based: Resolve branch names to commits
  2. Validate git repository:

    git rev-parse --git-dir
    
  3. Check range has commits:

    git log <range> --oneline | head -1
    

    If empty, inform user and exit.

Step 2: Extract Commit History

# Get all commits in range
git log <range> --oneline --no-decorate

# Get detailed commit info
git log <range> --format="%h|%an|%ar|%s" --no-decorate

# Count commits
git log <range> --oneline | wc -l

Store commit data for summary.

Step 3: Generate Statistics

Overall change statistics:

# Summary stats (insertions/deletions by file)
git diff <start>..<end> --stat

# Numeric stats for parsing
git diff <start>..<end> --numstat

# Count total changes
git diff <start>..<end> --shortstat

Author breakdown (if multiple authors):

git shortlog <start>..<end> -sn

File categorization:

  • Identify new files (show in status "A")
  • Identify deleted files (show in status "D")
  • Identify renamed files (show in status "R")
  • Modified files with change magnitude

Step 4: Identify Key Files for Detailed Analysis

Prioritization rules:

  1. Large changes (>100 lines modified): Always include
  2. New files: Include (especially if >50 lines)
  3. Deleted files: Note but don't diff
  4. Architecture files: build.gradle.kts, AndroidManifest.xml, module configs
  5. Test files: Flag separately for test coverage assessment

Extract key file list:

# Files changed with line counts
git diff <start>..<end> --numstat | sort -rn -k1 -k2

Limit to top 10 files by default to avoid context overflow.

Step 5: Generate Selective Diffs (Based on Depth)

Concise mode: No diffs, stats only

Detailed mode: Diffs for top 3-5 key files

git diff <start>..<end> -- path/to/key/file.kt

Code Review mode: Diffs for all modified files, grouped by module

# Group by directory
git diff <start>..<end> --name-only | cut -d'/' -f1-2 | sort -u

# Generate diffs per module
for module in modules; do
  git diff <start>..<end> -- $module/
done

Context overflow protection:

  • If >10 files changed significantly, limit to top 5 diffs
  • Warn user: "Showing top 5 files by change size. Request specific files for full diffs."

Step 6: Present Structured Summary

Format based on depth:

Concise Summary

## Git Session Summary

**Range**: <start-commit> to <end-commit> (<timeframe>)
**Commits**: X commits by Y author(s)
**Files Changed**: A modified, B added, C deleted
**Net Changes**: +X -Y lines

### Commits

- abc123 Commit message 1
- def456 Commit message 2
  ...

### Top Files Changed

1. path/to/file1.kt (+50 -20)
2. path/to/file2.kt (+30 -15)
   ...

Detailed Summary

Includes:

  • Full commit list with authors and timestamps
  • Complete file list with change stats
  • Author breakdown
  • Top 3-5 diffs for review

Code Review Format

## Code Review Summary

### Overview

- **PR Title**: [Suggested from commit messages]
- **Changes**: X files across Y modules
- **Scope**: [Inferred from changed files]

### Commits

[Formatted commit list suitable for PR description]

### Changes by Module

**Module: app**

- file1.kt: Description of changes
- file2.kt: Description of changes

**Module: core**
...

### Key Changes

[Diffs for significant modifications]

### Test Coverage

- Test files modified: X
- New tests added: ~Y

Output Guidelines

Commit Messages

  • Show short hash (7 chars)
  • Show first line of commit message only
  • Truncate long messages to 80 chars
  • Group by author if multiple contributors

File Paths

  • Use relative paths from repo root
  • Format as code: path/to/file.kt
  • Include line change magnitude: (+X -Y)
  • Highlight file type (source, test, config)

Statistics

Present in clear tables:

| Metric        | Count |
| ------------- | ----- |
| Commits       | 15    |
| Files Changed | 23    |
| Insertions    | +450  |
| Deletions     | -180  |

Diffs

  • Include file path as header: ### path/to/file.kt
  • Use code blocks with syntax highlighting
  • Show context lines (git default: 3 lines before/after)
  • Truncate very large diffs (>200 lines) with summary

Context Budget Management

Monitor diff sizes:

  • Small session (<10 files, <500 lines): Safe for detailed mode
  • Medium session (10-30 files, 500-2000 lines): Use selective diffs
  • Large session (>30 files, >2000 lines): Concise mode with warnings

Progressive disclosure:

  1. Always start with concise summary
  2. Ask user: "Would you like detailed diffs for specific files?"
  3. Generate diffs on demand rather than upfront

Fallback for large sessions: "This session modified 45 files with 5000+ line changes. Showing concise summary. Request specific files or modules for detailed diffs."

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Don't:

  • Generate diffs for all files in large sessions (context overflow)
  • Include full diffs without asking (waste context on unneeded details)
  • Ignore file types (treat test changes same as source changes)
  • Lose context on what user wants to know
  • Use generic summaries ("modified 10 files") without specifics

Do:

  • Ask user what level of detail they need
  • Prioritize key files by change magnitude
  • Categorize files (source, test, config, docs)
  • Provide actionable summaries
  • Offer to drill down on specific files

Success Criteria

A good git session analysis should:

  1. Inform: User understands scope of changes at a glance
  2. Focus: Highlights most significant changes first
  3. Actionable: Provides paths and diffs for deeper review
  4. Efficient: Doesn't waste context on unnecessary details
  5. Adaptable: Adjusts depth based on session size and user needs

Example Outputs

See contexts/example-outputs.md for detailed examples of concise summaries and code review formats.

來自 bitwarden 的更多技能

figma-to-angular
bitwarden
此技能可將 Figma 設計規格轉換為 Bitwarden Clients 單一儲存庫中,具備 Storybook 故事的完整 Angular 元件。輸出結果應在視覺上符合設計,同時遵循所有程式碼庫慣例。
force-multiplier
bitwarden
將單一意圖同時套用於多個目標——例如 Bitwarden 生態系中的一組儲存庫,或單一 monorepo 內的多個專案——以 N 個一致的操作來執行,…
coordinating-cross-team-breakdown
bitwarden
協調跨團隊審查與簽核 Bitwarden 技術分解。用於識別受影響團隊、建立第三部分簽核表格、追蹤…
assessing-jira-issue-relevance
bitwarden
當使用者提供單一Jira議題金鑰,並詢問該議題是否仍相關、仍適用、仍待處理、仍是錯誤、已修復,或可否……時使用。
assessing-test-coverage
bitwarden
用於判斷特定變更(PR、Jira key、Tech Breakdown 文件、Testmo CSV、變更路徑或具名……)已存在哪些測試覆蓋範圍時使用。
retrospecting
bitwarden
對 Claude Code 工作階段進行全面分析,檢視 Git 歷史記錄、對話日誌、程式碼變更,並收集使用者回饋以產生…
reviewing-incremental-changes
bitwarden
在重新審視已有評論的PR,或回應開發者在初次審查後的變更時,使用此技能。適用於存在PR討論串或…的情況。
starting-breakdown
bitwarden
Sets up a new Bitwarden Tech Breakdown in the bitwarden/tech-breakdowns repo. Creates a per-breakdown folder (`<team>/<JIRA-KEY>-<short-slug>/`) containing…