training-report

bởi samber

Tạo báo cáo đào tạo/hội thảo chuyên nghiệp dưới dạng tệp .docx. Sử dụng kỹ năng này bất cứ khi nào người dùng đề cập đến "báo cáo đào tạo", "báo cáo hội thảo", "compte rendu", "compte rendu de formation", "báo cáo formation", "debriefing một hội thảo", "viết lại một buổi đào tạo", "résumé de formation", hoặc bất kỳ yêu cầu nào để ghi lại một buổi đào tạo, hội thảo, hoặc sự kiện onboarding với phản hồi và khuyến nghị của từng người tham gia. Cũng kích hoạt khi người dùng nói những điều như "Tôi vừa tổ chức một hội thảo và...

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills --skill training-report

Training Report

Iterate the full report in Markdown first. Generate the .docx last, once, when the content is final. The .md is the canonical artifact; the .docx is a terminal derivative.

Discipline-agnostic: coding workshop, leadership seminar, safety training, onboarding, creative workshop — all apply equally.

Voice mode: this conversation may be conducted by voice. Transcription can introduce homophones, missing punctuation, or ambiguous proper nouns (names, company names, tool names). If any answer is unclear after transcription, ask a short clarifying question before moving on — do not guess.

Reference files

Load these files at the steps indicated. Do not load them all upfront.

FileLoad at
references/tone-of-voice.mdStep 1 (after language + audience confirmed)
references/markdown-draft.mdStep 5 (before writing the draft)
references/docx-generation.mdStep 6 (before generating the .docx)

Step 0 — Check dependencies

Before asking the user anything, verify skill availability.

docx skill (required for Step 6)

  • If found: note it; load it at Step 6
  • If not found: warn the user — it is required to generate the final Word document and can be installed from Anthropic's official skill library. Offer to proceed with the Markdown draft in the meantime.

Humanizer skill (recommended)

  • After Step 1, look for a humanizer skill matching the chosen language
  • If found: load it and apply it during the humanization pass in Step 5
  • If not found: tell the user once, then fall back to inline humanization rules (Step 5b). Suggest installing a humanizer skill for the chosen language.

Step 1 — Language & audience

Ask:

  1. "In what language should I write the report? (French / English / other)"
  2. "Who is the primary reader? (executive / HR / direct management / external client / internal archive)"

Then load references/tone-of-voice.md and apply its guidance throughout.

Step 2 — Template

Ask:

"Do you have a Word (.docx) template for this report? (company header/footer, logo, branded fonts, color scheme)"

  • Yes → ask them to upload it; use it as the base at Step 6 (unpack/inject/repack)
  • No → proceed with a clean document; ask for a brand color before defaulting to blue #2E75B6

Step 3 — Interview

Conduct a structured interview in batches. Wait for answers before moving on. Extract what the user already told you from the conversation before asking.

Batch A — Session metadata

  • Trainer name and role
  • Date, location, company/team name
  • Duration
  • Total number of participants
  • Confirm or refine: who is the document for?

Batch B — Session context

  • Stated goal of the training
  • Subject, topic, tool, or material used as practical support
  • Any rules or constraints set at the start
  • Materials, accounts, licenses, or equipment provided to participants

Batch C — Starting levels

  • Distribution of familiarity across the group (any beginners? any experts?)
  • Notable outliers at either end

Batch D — Session walkthrough

Walk through the session step by step. For each step:

  • Objective
  • What participants actually did
  • Materials, tools, or exercises involved
  • First exposure to this concept or not
  • How it landed; any difficulties

Probe until complete: "What happened next?", "Did anything go differently than planned?", "Were there any pivots?"

Batch E — Deliverables

Ask: "Did participants produce anything during the session?"

Probe for:

  • Documents, files, diagrams, prototypes, or any output created during exercises
  • Collaborative work produced as a group
  • Individual work produced autonomously
  • Anything left incomplete or started but not finished

These may appear in the Annexes and/or be referenced in the Session Walkthrough.

Batch F — General observations

  • Overall energy and engagement of the group
  • Any incidents, surprises, or notable moments
  • Schedule: did it hold, or were sections cut/extended?
  • Logistical issues (room, materials, setup)

General Observations is optional. If the trainer has nothing notable to add beyond the walkthrough, skip this section entirely.

Batch G — Individual feedback

Ask: "Do you have specific observations for any individual participant?"

For each named participant, extract:

  • Role or background
  • Starting level
  • Behavior/engagement (positive and negative)
  • Notable evolution, breakthrough, or resistance
  • How they ended the session

Individual Feedback is optional. Only write it if the trainer explicitly provides meaningful observations. Do not prompt for feedback on every participant.

Be diplomatic. Describe behaviors, not character. Name problems factually; do not editorialize. When writing for an external client about a team you don't know, consider whether naming individuals is appropriate at all.

See references/tone-of-voice.md — Diplomatic framing section.

Batch H — Recommendations & next steps

Ask: "What would you recommend to the direction/client to build on this session?"

Probe for:

  • Resources and access to provide (licenses, books, platforms, communities)
  • Practices to anchor in daily work
  • What to pace carefully — basics before advanced material
  • Follow-up sessions (refresher, coaching, Q&A after a few weeks)
  • Assessment and validation (quiz, practical challenge, peer review, checklist)
  • Knowledge-sharing rituals (Slack/Teams channel, recurring meeting, Loom demos, buddy system, monthly show-and-tell)
  • Management involvement (protect practice time, 1:1 check-ins, celebrate wins)
  • External resources (books, courses, certifications) for self-driven participants
  • Specific warnings or caveats for management

Batch I — Annexes

Ask: "Do you have any annexes to attach to the report?"

Annexes can include:

  • Photos from the session
  • Satisfaction survey results (NPS, ratings, verbatim comments)
  • Slides or handouts distributed during the session
  • Work produced by participants (exercises, prototypes, documents, diagrams)
  • Reference documents used during the session
  • Any other supporting material

For each annex:

  • Image → attempt auto-embed at Step 6
  • File (PDF, slides, spreadsheet) → reference in the Annexes section; do not embed
  • Survey data → synthesize in Step 4, then include as a dedicated section in the doc
  • Participant deliverable → reference in the relevant Walkthrough step AND in Annexes

Batch J — Closing & contact

Ask: "May I include a closing note thanking the team for the invitation, and your contact details for future collaboration? (email + phone)"

If yes: collect name, email, phone. The closing is written in the document language, personal in tone, brief. See references/markdown-draft.md — Closing paragraph section.

Step 4 — Feedback synthesis (if survey data provided)

Produce a synthesis in the conversation before drafting:

  • Overall score / NPS
  • Rating distribution
  • Top 3 positive themes
  • Top 3 areas for improvement
  • Any outlier responses

Ask the user to confirm before it enters the document.

Step 4b — Confirm outline

Here's what I'll draft:
1. Context
2. Starting Levels
3. Session Walkthrough (N steps)
4. General Observations         [optional — include if trainer provided content]
5. Participant Satisfaction     [only if survey data provided]
6. Individual Feedback          [optional — include if trainer provided feedback]
7. Recommendations & Next Steps
8. Annexes                      [only if annexes provided]
[Closing + contact]

Language: [language] | Audience: [target] | Template: [yes/no]

Ask: "Anything to adjust before I start the draft?"

Step 5 — Markdown draft

Load references/markdown-draft.md before writing. It contains the full section-by- section writing guide, Markdown limitations, HTML table workarounds, and closing paragraph guidance.

Humanization pass

Before presenting the draft, apply the humanizer skill (loaded in Step 0). If no humanizer skill is available, apply these rules inline:

  • Cut all AI throat-clearing openers and sentence starters
  • Cut adjective doublets — pick the more precise word
  • Replace passive voice with active wherever natural
  • Replace vague praise or criticism with specific behaviors or facts
  • Short sentences over long ones
  • Adapt to the document language (see references/tone-of-voice.md)

Do not present an un-humanized draft.

Iteration loop

Present the draft inline in the conversation. Let the user lead. Update the .md file for every change. One canonical file, no versions. Only move to Step 6 when the user explicitly confirms the content is final.

Step 6 — Final .docx generation

Load references/docx-generation.md and the docx skill before starting.

This step runs once. It is terminal: if the user requests changes after the .docx is generated, update the .md and regenerate from scratch.

Deliver both files. If the environment supports inline file delivery (e.g. present_files on Claude.ai), use it. Otherwise, print the absolute paths to both files.

Pitfalls

  • Don't fabricate details — only document what the trainer explicitly provided
  • Don't editorialize in General Observations — factual only
  • Don't write Individual Feedback unless explicitly provided — and stay diplomatic
  • Don't pad recommendations — 6 sharp ones beat 12 vague ones
  • Always include a Pacing recommendation in the Next Steps
  • This skill is not developer-specific — adapt vocabulary to the discipline
  • Never generate the .docx mid-conversation — Markdown is the draft stage
  • Never skip an annex or image — embed, reference, or placeholder

Thêm skills từ samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Các mẫu thiết kế Golang theo phong cách bản địa — tùy chọn hàm, hàm khởi tạo, luồng lỗi và xếp tầng, quản lý tài nguyên và vòng đời, tắt máy an toàn, khả năng phục hồi, kiến trúc, tiêm phụ thuộc, xử lý dữ liệu, truyền phát, v.v. Áp dụng khi lựa chọn rõ ràng giữa các mẫu kiến trúc, triển khai tùy chọn hàm, thiết kế API hàm khởi tạo, thiết lập tắt máy an toàn, áp dụng các mẫu phục hồi, hoặc hỏi mẫu Go bản địa nào phù hợp với một vấn đề cụ thể.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Các mẫu và phương pháp tối ưu hiệu năng Golang - nếu X là điểm nghẽn, thì áp dụng Y. Bao gồm giảm cấp phát, hiệu quả CPU, bố trí bộ nhớ, tinh chỉnh GC, pooling, caching, và tối ưu đường dẫn nóng. Sử dụng khi profiling hoặc benchmark đã xác định được điểm nghẽn và bạn cần mẫu tối ưu phù hợp để khắc phục. Cũng sử dụng khi thực hiện đánh giá mã hiệu năng để đề xuất cải tiến hoặc benchmark có thể giúp xác định các cải thiện hiệu năng nhanh chóng. Không dành cho phương pháp đo lường (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Các phương pháp bảo mật tốt nhất và phòng ngừa lỗ hổng cho Golang. Bao gồm injection (SQL, lệnh, XSS), mật mã học, an toàn hệ thống tệp, bảo mật mạng, cookie, quản lý bí mật, an toàn bộ nhớ và ghi nhật ký. Áp dụng khi viết, xem xét hoặc kiểm tra mã Go về bảo mật, hoặc khi làm việc trên bất kỳ mã rủi ro nào liên quan đến mật mã, I/O, quản lý bí mật, xử lý đầu vào người dùng hoặc xác thực. Bao gồm cấu hình các công cụ bảo mật.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Hướng dẫn toàn diện về truy cập cơ sở dữ liệu Go — truy vấn tham số hóa, quét struct, cột NULL, giao dịch, mức cô lập, SELECT FOR UPDATE, connection pool, xử lý hàng loạt, truyền context và công cụ migration. Sử dụng khi viết, xem xét hoặc gỡ lỗi mã Golang tương tác với PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL hoặc SQLite; để kiểm thử cơ sở dữ liệu; hoặc cho các câu hỏi về database/sql, sqlx hoặc pgx. KHÔNG tạo lược đồ cơ sở dữ liệu hoặc SQL migration.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Các phương pháp linting tốt nhất và cấu hình golangci-lint cho các dự án Golang — chạy linters, cấu hình .golangci.yml, loại bỏ cảnh báo bằng chỉ thị nolint, diễn giải đầu ra lint, và lựa chọn linters. Sử dụng khi cấu hình golangci-lint, hỏi về cảnh báo lint hoặc loại bỏ nolint, thiết lập công cụ chất lượng mã, hoặc chọn linters. Cũng sử dụng khi người dùng đề cập đến golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, hoặc revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting