SpecLock
AI constraint engine β persistent memory + active enforcement. Stops AI from breaking locked code. Semantic conflict detection, file-level guards, session continuity. 19 MCP tools.
You: "Never touch the auth system"
AI: π Locked.
... 5 sessions later ...
You: "Add social login to the login page"
AI: β οΈ BLOCKED β violates lock "Never touch the auth system"
Matched: auth β authentication (synonym), login β auth (concept)
Confidence: 100%
Should I find another approach?
100/100 on Claude's independent test suite. 929 tests across 18 suites. 0 false positives. 15.7ms per check. Gemini Flash hybrid, Spec Compiler, Code Graph, Typed Constraints, Python SDK, ROS2 integration.
Install
npx speclock setup --goal "Build my app"
That's it. One command. Works everywhere β Bolt.new, Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, Windsurf, Cline, Aider.
The Problem
AI coding tools have memory now. Claude Code has CLAUDE.md. Cursor has .cursorrules. Mem0 exists.
But memory without enforcement is useless.
Your AI remembers you use PostgreSQL β then switches to MongoDB because it "seemed better." Your AI remembers your auth setup β then rewrites it while "fixing" a bug. You said "never touch the payment logic" 3 sessions ago β the AI doesn't care.
Remembering is not respecting. No existing tool stops the AI from breaking what you locked.
How It Works
You set constraints. SpecLock enforces them β across sessions, across tools, across teams.
speclock lock "Never modify auth files" β auto-guards src/auth/*.ts
speclock lock "Database must stay PostgreSQL" β catches "migrate to MongoDB"
speclock lock "Never delete patient records" β catches "clean up old data"
speclock lock "Don't touch the payment flow" β catches "streamline checkout"
The semantic engine doesn't do keyword matching. It understands:
- "clean up old data" = deletion (euphemism detection)
- "streamline checkout" = modify payment flow (synonym + concept mapping)
- "temporarily disable logging" = disable logging (temporal evasion detection)
- "Update UI and also drop the users table" = hidden violation (compound splitter)
And it knows what's safe:
- "Enable audit logging" when the lock says "Never disable audit logging" β no conflict (intent alignment)
Quick Start by Platform
Bolt.new / Aider / Any npm Platform
npx speclock setup --goal "Build my app" --template nextjs
Creates SPECLOCK.md, injects rules into package.json, generates .speclock/context/latest.md. The AI reads these automatically.
Claude Code
Add to .mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"speclock": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "speclock", "serve", "--project", "."]
}
}
}
Cursor / Windsurf / Cline
Same config β add to .cursor/mcp.json or equivalent.
Lovable (No Install)
- Go to Settings β Connectors β New MCP server
- Enter URL:
https://speclock-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp - Paste project instructions into Knowledge
Why SpecLock Over Alternatives?
| Claude Memory | Mem0 | .cursorrules | SpecLock | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remembers context | Yes | Yes | Manual | Yes |
| Blocks the AI from breaking things | No | No | No | Yes |
| Semantic conflict detection | No | No | No | 100/100 score, 0% FP |
| Tamper-proof audit trail | No | No | No | HMAC-SHA256 chain |
| Hard enforcement (AI cannot proceed) | No | No | No | Yes |
| SOC 2 / HIPAA compliance exports | No | No | No | Yes |
| Encrypted storage (AES-256-GCM) | No | No | No | Yes |
| RBAC + API key auth | No | No | No | 4 roles |
| Policy-as-Code DSL | No | No | No | YAML rules |
| Works on Bolt.new, Lovable, etc. | No | No | No | Yes |
Other tools remember. SpecLock enforces.
Semantic Engine
Not keyword matching β real semantic analysis with Gemini Flash hybrid for universal domain coverage. Scored 100/100 on Claude's independent adversarial test battery (7 suites, including false positives, question framing, patch gateway, and diff analysis).
Under the hood: 65+ synonym groups Β· 80+ euphemism mappings Β· domain concept maps (fintech, e-commerce, IoT, healthcare, SaaS, payments, gaming, telecom, government) Β· intent classifier Β· compound sentence splitter Β· temporal evasion detector Β· verb tense normalization Β· UI cosmetic detection Β· safe-intent patterns Β· passive voice parsing β all in pure JavaScript. Gemini Flash hybrid for grey-zone cases ($0.01/1000 checks).
Hard Enforcement
Two modes:
Advisory (default): AI gets a warning, decides what to do
Hard mode: AI is BLOCKED β MCP returns isError, AI cannot proceed
speclock enforce hard # Enable hard mode β violations above threshold are blocked
- Configurable threshold β default 70%. Only HIGH confidence conflicts block.
- Override with reason β
speclock override <lockId> "JIRA-1234: approved by CTO"(logged to audit trail) - Auto-escalation β lock overridden 3+ times β auto-flags for review
Enterprise Security
API Key Auth + RBAC
speclock auth create-key --role developer --name "CI Bot"
# β sk_speclock_a1b2c3... (shown once, stored as SHA-256 hash)
| Role | Read | Write Locks | Override | Admin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
viewer | Yes | β | β | β |
developer | Yes | β | With reason | β |
architect | Yes | Yes | Yes | β |
admin | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
AES-256-GCM Encryption
export SPECLOCK_ENCRYPTION_KEY="your-secret"
speclock encrypt # Encrypts brain.json + events.log at rest
PBKDF2 key derivation (100K iterations). Authenticated encryption. HIPAA 2026 compliant.
HMAC Audit Chain
Every event gets an HMAC-SHA256 hash chained to the previous event. Modify anything β the chain breaks.
$ speclock audit-verify
β Audit chain VALID β 247 events, 0 broken links, no tampering detected.
Compliance Exports
speclock export --format soc2 # SOC 2 Type II report (JSON)
speclock export --format hipaa # HIPAA PHI protection report
speclock export --format csv # All events for auditor spreadsheets
Policy-as-Code
Declarative YAML rules for organization-wide enforcement:
# .speclock/policy.yml
rules:
- name: "HIPAA PHI Protection"
match:
files: ["**/patient/**", "**/medical/**"]
actions: [delete, modify, export]
enforce: block
severity: critical
- name: "No direct DB mutations"
match:
files: ["**/models/**"]
actions: [delete]
enforce: warn
severity: high
Import and export policies between projects. Share constraint templates across your organization.
Spec Compiler (v5.0)
Paste a PRD, README, or architecture doc β SpecLock extracts all constraints automatically:
Input: "We're building a fintech app. Use React and FastAPI.
Never touch the auth module. Response time must stay
under 200ms. Payments go through Stripe."
Output: 2 text locks:
- "Never touch the auth module"
- "Payments go through Stripe β don't change provider"
1 typed lock:
- response_time_ms <= 200 (numerical)
2 decisions:
- "Use React for frontend"
- "Use FastAPI for backend"
Uses Gemini Flash by default ($0.01 per 1000 compilations). No API key needed for core SpecLock β only the compiler uses LLM. Falls back gracefully if no key is set.
Code Graph (v5.0)
Live dependency graph of your codebase. Parses JS/TS/Python imports.
$ speclock blast-radius src/core/memory.js
Direct Dependents: 8 files
Transitive Impact: 14 files (33% of codebase)
Max Depth: 4 hops
Lock-to-file mapping: Lock "Never modify auth" β automatically maps to src/api/auth.js, src/middleware/auth.js, src/utils/jwt.js. No configuration needed.
Module detection: Groups files into logical modules, tracks inter-module dependencies, identifies critical paths.
Typed Constraints (v5.0)
Real-time value and state checking for autonomous systems, IoT, robotics:
// Numerical: speed must be <= 2.0 m/s
{ constraintType: "numerical", metric: "speed_mps", operator: "<=", value: 2.0 }
// Range: temperature must stay between 20-25Β°C
{ constraintType: "range", metric: "temperature_c", min: 20, max: 25 }
// State: never go from armed β disarmed without approval
{ constraintType: "state", metric: "system_mode", forbidden: [{ from: "armed", to: "disarmed" }] }
// Temporal: heartbeat must occur every 30 seconds
{ constraintType: "temporal", metric: "heartbeat_s", operator: "<=", value: 30 }
Python SDK & ROS2 (v5.0)
pip install speclock-sdk
from speclock import SpecLock
sl = SpecLock(project_root=".")
# Check text constraints (semantic conflict detection)
result = sl.check_text("Switch database to MongoDB")
# β { has_conflict: True, conflicting_locks: [...] }
# Check typed constraints (numerical/range/state/temporal)
result = sl.check_typed(metric="speed_mps", value=3.5)
# β violation: speed exceeds 2.0 m/s limit
# Combined check (text + typed in one call)
result = sl.check(action="Increase speed", speed_mps=3.5)
Uses the same .speclock/brain.json as the Node.js MCP server β constraints stay in sync across all environments.
ROS2 Guardian Node: Real-time constraint enforcement for robots and autonomous systems.
# config/constraints.yaml
constraints:
- type: range
metric: joint_position_rad
min: -3.14
max: 3.14
- type: numerical
metric: velocity_mps
operator: "<="
value: 2.0
- type: state
metric: system_mode
forbidden:
- from: emergency_stop
to: autonomous
- Subscribes to
/joint_states,/cmd_vel,/speclock/state_transition - Publishes violations to
/speclock/violations - Triggers emergency stop via
/speclock/emergency_stop - Checks constraints on every incoming ROS2 message at configurable rate
Patch Gateway (v5.1)
One API call gates every change. Takes a description + file list, returns ALLOW/WARN/BLOCK:
speclock_review_patch({
description: "Add social login to auth page",
files: ["src/auth/login.js"]
})
β { verdict: "BLOCK", riskScore: 85,
reasons: [{ type: "semantic_conflict", lock: "Never modify auth" }],
blastRadius: { impactPercent: 28.3 },
summary: "BLOCKED. 1 constraint conflict. 12 files affected." }
Combines semantic conflict detection + lock-to-file mapping + blast radius + typed constraint awareness into a single risk score (0-100).
AI Patch Firewall (v5.2)
Reviews actual diffs, not just descriptions. Catches things intent review misses:
POST /api/v2/gateway/review-diff
{
"description": "Remove password column",
"diff": "diff --git a/migrations/001.sql ..."
}
β { verdict: "BLOCK",
reviewMode: "unified",
intentVerdict: "ALLOW", β description alone looks safe
diffVerdict: "BLOCK", β diff reveals destructive schema change
signals: {
schemaChange: { score: 12, isDestructive: true },
interfaceBreak: { score: 10 },
protectedSymbolEdit: { score: 8 },
dependencyDrift: { score: 5 },
publicApiImpact: { score: 0 }
},
recommendation: { action: "require_approval" } }
Signal detection: Interface breaks (removed/changed exports), protected symbol edits in locked zones, dependency drift (critical package add/remove), schema/migration destructive changes, public API route changes.
Hard escalation rules: Auto-BLOCK on destructive schema changes, removed API routes, protected symbol edits, or multiple critical findings β regardless of score.
Unified review: Merges intent (35%) + diff (65%), takes the stronger verdict. Falls back to intent-only when no diff is available.
REST API v2
Real-time constraint checking, patch review, and autonomous systems:
# Patch Gateway (v5.1)
POST /api/v2/gateway/review { description, files, useLLM }
# AI Patch Firewall (v5.2)
POST /api/v2/gateway/review-diff { description, files, diff, options }
POST /api/v2/gateway/parse-diff { diff }
# Typed constraint checking
POST /api/v2/check-typed { metric, value, entity }
POST /api/v2/check-batch { checks: [...] }
# SSE streaming (real-time violations)
GET /api/v2/stream
# Spec Compiler
POST /api/v2/compiler/compile { text, autoApply }
# Code Graph
GET /api/v2/graph/blast-radius?file=src/core/memory.js
GET /api/v2/graph/lock-map
POST /api/v2/graph/build
42 MCP Tools
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
speclock_init | Initialize SpecLock in project |
speclock_get_context | Full context pack (the key tool) |
speclock_set_goal | Set project goal |
speclock_add_lock | Add constraint + auto-guard files |
speclock_remove_lock | Soft-delete a lock |
speclock_add_decision | Record architectural decision |
speclock_add_note | Add pinned note |
speclock_set_deploy_facts | Record deploy config |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
speclock_check_conflict | Semantic conflict check against all locks |
speclock_set_enforcement | Switch advisory/hard mode |
speclock_override_lock | Override with reason (audit logged) |
speclock_override_history | View override audit trail |
speclock_semantic_audit | Analyze git diff against locks |
speclock_detect_drift | Scan for constraint violations |
speclock_audit | Audit staged files pre-commit |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
speclock_session_briefing | Start session + full briefing |
speclock_session_summary | End session + record summary |
speclock_log_change | Log a change with files |
speclock_get_changes | Recent tracked changes |
speclock_get_events | Full event log (filterable) |
speclock_checkpoint | Git tag for rollback |
speclock_repo_status | Branch, commit, diff summary |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
speclock_suggest_locks | AI-powered lock suggestions |
speclock_health | Health score + multi-agent timeline |
speclock_apply_template | Apply constraint template |
speclock_report | Violation stats + most tested locks |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
speclock_verify_audit | Verify HMAC chain integrity |
speclock_export_compliance | SOC 2 / HIPAA / CSV reports |
speclock_policy_evaluate | Evaluate policy rules |
speclock_policy_manage | CRUD for policy rules |
speclock_telemetry | Opt-in usage analytics |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
speclock_add_typed_lock | Add typed constraint (numerical/range/state/temporal) |
speclock_check_typed | Check proposed values against typed constraints |
speclock_list_typed_locks | List all typed constraints |
speclock_update_threshold | Update typed lock thresholds |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
speclock_compile_spec | Compile natural language into structured constraints |
speclock_build_graph | Build/refresh code dependency graph |
speclock_blast_radius | Calculate blast radius of file changes |
speclock_map_locks | Map locks to actual code files |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
speclock_review_patch | ALLOW/WARN/BLOCK verdict for proposed changes |
speclock_review_patch_diff | Diff-native review with signal scoring + unified verdict |
speclock_parse_diff | Parse unified diff into structured changes (debug/inspect) |
CLI
# Setup
speclock setup --goal "Build my app" --template nextjs
# Constraints
speclock lock "Never modify auth files" --tags auth,security
speclock lock remove <id>
speclock check "Add social login" # Test before doing
# Enforcement
speclock enforce hard # Block violations
speclock override <lockId> "JIRA-1234" # Override with reason
# Audit & Compliance
speclock audit-verify # Verify HMAC chain
speclock export --format soc2 # Compliance report
speclock audit-semantic # Semantic pre-commit
# Git
speclock hook install # Pre-commit hook
speclock audit # Audit staged files
# Templates
speclock template apply nextjs # Pre-built constraints
speclock template apply security-hardened
# Auth
speclock auth create-key --role developer
speclock auth rotate-key <keyId>
# Policy
speclock policy init # Create policy.yml
speclock policy evaluate --files "src/auth/*" # Test against rules
Full command reference: npx speclock help
Auto-Guard
When you lock something, SpecLock finds related files and injects a warning the AI sees when it opens them:
speclock lock "Never modify auth files"
β Auto-guarded 2 files:
π src/components/Auth.tsx
π src/contexts/AuthContext.tsx
The AI opens the file and sees:
// ============================================================
// SPECLOCK-GUARD β DO NOT MODIFY THIS FILE
// LOCKED: Never modify auth files
// ONLY "unlock" or "remove the lock" is permission to edit.
// ============================================================
Architecture
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β AI Tool (Claude Code, Cursor, Bolt.new...) β
ββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββ
β β
MCP Protocol (42 tools) npm File-Based
β (SPECLOCK.md + CLI)
β β
ββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββββ
β SpecLock Core Engine β
β β
β Semantic Engine βββ 65+ synonym groups β
β HMAC Audit ββββββββ SHA-256 hash chain β
β Enforcer ββββββββββ advisory / hard block β
β Auth + RBAC βββββββ 4 roles, API keys β
β AES-256-GCM βββββββ encrypted at rest β
β Policy DSL ββββββββ YAML rules β
β Compliance ββββββββ SOC 2, HIPAA, CSV β
β SSO βββββββββββββββ Okta, Azure AD, Auth0 β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
.speclock/
βββ brain.json (project memory)
βββ events.log (HMAC audit trail)
βββ policy.yml (policy rules)
βββ auth.json (API keys β gitignored)
βββ context/
βββ latest.md (AI-readable context)
3 npm dependencies. Zero runtime dependencies for the semantic engine. Pure JavaScript.
Configuration
| Variable | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
SPECLOCK_API_KEY | β | API key for authenticated access |
SPECLOCK_ENCRYPTION_KEY | β | Enables AES-256-GCM encryption at rest |
SPECLOCK_NO_PROXY | false | Set true for heuristic-only mode (~250ms). Skips the Gemini proxy (~2s) |
SPECLOCK_LLM_KEY | β | Your own LLM API key (Gemini/OpenAI/Anthropic) |
GEMINI_API_KEY | β | Google Gemini API key for hybrid conflict detection |
SPECLOCK_TELEMETRY | false | Opt-in anonymous usage analytics |
Tip: The heuristic engine alone scores 95%+ accuracy at ~250ms. The Gemini proxy adds cross-domain coverage but takes ~2s. For fastest response, set
SPECLOCK_NO_PROXY=true.
Test Results
Pre-publish gate runs all 18 suites before every npm publish. If any test fails, publish is blocked.
| Suite | Tests | Pass Rate | What it covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real-World Testers | 111 | 100% | 5 developers, 30+ locks, diverse domains |
| Adversarial Conflict | 46 | 100% | Euphemisms, temporal evasion, compound sentences |
| Phase 4 (Multi-domain) | 91 | 100% | Fintech, e-commerce, IoT, healthcare, SaaS |
| Sam (Enterprise HIPAA) | 124 | 100% | HIPAA locks, PHI, encryption, RBAC |
| Auth & Crypto | 114 | 100% | API keys, RBAC, AES-256 encryption |
| John (Indie Dev Journey) | 86 | 100% | 8-session Bolt.new build with 5 locks |
| Diff-Native Review | 76 | 100% | Interface breaks, schema changes, API impact |
| Patch Gateway | 57 | 100% | ALLOW/WARN/BLOCK verdicts, blast radius |
| Compliance Export | 50 | 100% | SOC 2, HIPAA, CSV formats |
| Enforcement | 40 | 100% | Hard/advisory mode, overrides |
| Audit Chain | 35 | 100% | HMAC-SHA256 chain integrity |
| Code Graph | 33 | 100% | Import parsing, blast radius, lock mapping |
| Spec Compiler | 24 | 100% | NLβconstraints parsing, auto-apply |
| Typed Constraints | 13 | 100% | Numerical, range, state, temporal validation |
| Claude Regression | 9 | 100% | Vue detection, safe-intent, patch gateway |
| Question Framing | 9 | 100% | "What if we..." and "How hard would it be..." |
| REST API v2 | 9 | 100% | Typed constraint endpoints, SSE |
| PII/Export Detection | 8 | 100% | SSN, email export, data access violations |
| Total | 929 | 100% | 18 suites, 15+ domains |
External validation: Claude's independent 7-suite adversarial test battery β 100/100 (100%) on v5.2.6. Zero false positives. Zero missed violations. 15.7ms per check.
Tested across: fintech, e-commerce, IoT, healthcare, SaaS, gaming, biotech, aerospace, payments, payroll, robotics, autonomous systems, telecom, insurance, government. All 11 Indian payment gateways detected. Zero false positives on UI/cosmetic actions.
Real-World Tested
John β Indie developer on Bolt.new
8 sessions building an ecommerce app. 5 locks (auth, Firebase, Supabase, shipping, Stripe). Every direct violation caught. Every euphemistic attack caught ("clean up auth", "modernize database", "streamline serverless"). Zero false positives on safe actions (product page, cart, dark mode). 86/86 tests passed.
Sam β Senior engineer building a HIPAA hospital ERP
10 sessions with 8 HIPAA locks. Every violation caught β expose PHI, remove encryption, disable audit, downgrade MFA, bypass FHIR. Euphemistic HIPAA attacks caught ("simplify data flow", "modernize auth"). Full auth + RBAC + encryption + compliance export workflow verified. 124/124 tests passed.
Pricing
| Tier | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 10 locks, conflict detection, MCP, CLI |
| Pro | $19/mo | Unlimited locks, HMAC audit, compliance exports |
| Enterprise | $99/mo | + RBAC, encryption, SSO, policy-as-code |
Contributing
Issues and PRs welcome on GitHub.
License
Author
SpecLock is created and maintained by Sandeep Roy.
Sandeep Roy is the sole developer of SpecLock β the AI Constraint Engine that enforces project rules across AI coding sessions. All 42 MCP tools, the semantic conflict detection engine, enterprise security features (SOC 2, HIPAA, RBAC, encryption), and the pre-publish test gate were designed and built by Sandeep Roy.
Related Servers
Scout Monitoring MCP
sponsorPut performance and error data directly in the hands of your AI assistant.
Alpha Vantage MCP Server
sponsorAccess financial market data: realtime & historical stock, ETF, options, forex, crypto, commodities, fundamentals, technical indicators, & more
Authless Remote MCP Server
A remote MCP server deployable on Cloudflare Workers that does not require authentication. The server can be customized by defining tools.
pip Package README MCP Server
Fetch READMEs, metadata, and search for Python packages on PyPI.
Kapture
A Chrome DevTools Extension that enables browser automation through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for AI applications.
Remote DCInside MCP Server (Authless)
An example of a remote MCP server without authentication, deployable on Cloudflare Workers.
Adaptive Graph of Thoughts
An intelligent scientific reasoning framework that uses graph structures and Neo4j to perform advanced reasoning via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
CAD-MCP
Control CAD software with natural language instructions to perform drawing operations.
jpx
JMESPath query tool with 320+ extended functions for JSON transformation and analysis
MCP Experiments
An experimental dotnet MCP server that returns the current time, based on Laurent KempΓ©'s tutorial.
Smart AI Bridge
Intelligent Al routing and integration platform for seamless provider switching
LAML MCP Server
Loads and validates LAML (YAML-based markup language) documents via the Model Context Protocol.