golang-code-style

por samber

Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-code-style

Orchestration mode: Use ultracode when reviewing code style across a large codebase — orchestrate the sub-agents described in the "Parallelizing Code Style Reviews" section, each covering an independent style concern, and merge their findings.

Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-code-style skill takes precedence.

Go Code Style

Style rules that require human judgment — linters handle formatting, this skill handles clarity. For naming see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming skill; for design patterns see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns skill; for struct/interface design see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill.

"Clear is better than clever." — Go Proverbs

When ignoring a rule, add a comment to the code.

Line Length & Breaking

No rigid line limit, but lines beyond ~120 characters MUST be broken. Break at semantic boundaries, not arbitrary column counts. Function calls with 4+ arguments MUST use one argument per line — even when the prompt asks for single-line code:

// Good — each argument on its own line, closing paren separate
mux.HandleFunc("/api/users", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    handleUsers(
        w,
        r,
        serviceName,
        cfg,
        logger,
        authMiddleware,
    )
})

When a function signature is too long, the real fix is often fewer parameters (use an options struct) rather than better line wrapping. For multi-line signatures, put each parameter on its own line.

Variable Declarations

SHOULD use := for non-zero values, var for zero-value initialization. The form signals intent: var means "this starts at zero."

var count int              // zero value, set later
name := "default"          // non-zero, := is appropriate
var buf bytes.Buffer       // zero value is ready to use

Slice & Map Initialization

Slices and maps MUST be initialized explicitly, never nil. Nil maps panic on write; nil slices serialize to null in JSON (vs [] for empty slices), surprising API consumers.

users := []User{}                       // always initialized
m := map[string]int{}                   // always initialized
users := make([]User, 0, len(ids))      // preallocate when capacity is known
m := make(map[string]int, len(items))   // preallocate when size is known

Do not preallocate speculatively — make([]T, 0, 1000) wastes memory when the common case is 10 items.

Composite Literals

Composite literals MUST use field names — positional fields break when the type adds or reorders fields:

srv := &http.Server{
    Addr:         ":8080",
    ReadTimeout:  5 * time.Second,
    WriteTimeout: 10 * time.Second,
}

Control Flow

Reduce Nesting

Errors and edge cases MUST be handled first (early return). Keep the happy path at minimal indentation:

func process(data []byte) (*Result, error) {
    if len(data) == 0 {
        return nil, errors.New("empty data")
    }

    parsed, err := parse(data)
    if err != nil {
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("parsing: %w", err)
    }

    return transform(parsed), nil
}

Eliminate Unnecessary else

When the if body ends with return/break/continue, the else MUST be dropped. Use default-then-override for simple assignments — assign a default, then override with independent conditions or a switch:

// Good — default-then-override with switch (cleanest for mutually exclusive overrides)
level := slog.LevelInfo
switch {
case debug:
    level = slog.LevelDebug
case verbose:
    level = slog.LevelWarn
}

// Bad — else-if chain hides that there's a default
if debug {
    level = slog.LevelDebug
} else if verbose {
    level = slog.LevelWarn
} else {
    level = slog.LevelInfo
}

Complex Conditions & Init Scope

When an if condition has 3+ operands, MUST extract into named booleans — a wall of || is unreadable and hides business logic. Keep expensive checks inline for short-circuit benefit. Details

// Good — named booleans make intent clear
isAdmin := user.Role == RoleAdmin
isOwner := resource.OwnerID == user.ID
isPublicVerified := resource.IsPublic && user.IsVerified
if isAdmin || isOwner || isPublicVerified || permissions.Contains(PermOverride) {
    allow()
}

Scope variables to if blocks when only needed for the check:

if err := validate(input); err != nil {
    return err
}

Switch Over If-Else Chains

When comparing the same variable multiple times, prefer switch:

switch status {
case StatusActive:
    activate()
case StatusInactive:
    deactivate()
default:
    panic(fmt.Sprintf("unexpected status: %d", status))
}

Function Design

  • Functions SHOULD be short and focused — one function, one job.
  • Functions SHOULD have ≤4 parameters. Beyond that, use an options struct (see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns skill).
  • Parameter order: context.Context first, then inputs, then output destinations.
  • Naked returns help in very short functions (1-3 lines) where return values are obvious, but become confusing when readers must scroll to find what's returned — name returns explicitly in longer functions.
func FetchUser(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error)
func SendEmail(ctx context.Context, msg EmailMessage) error  // grouped into struct

Prefer range for Iteration

SHOULD use range over index-based loops. Use range n (Go 1.22+) for simple counting.

for _, user := range users {
    process(user)
}

Value vs Pointer Arguments

Pass small types (string, int, bool, time.Time) by value. Use pointers when mutating, for large structs (~128+ bytes), or when nil is meaningful. Details

Code Organization Within Files

  • Group related declarations: type, constructor, methods together
  • Order: package doc, imports, constants, types, constructors, methods, helpers
  • One primary type per file when it has significant methods
  • Blank imports (_ "pkg") register side effects (init functions). Restricting them to main and test packages makes side effects visible at the application root, not hidden in library code
  • Dot imports pollute the namespace and make it impossible to tell where a name comes from — never use in library code
  • Unexport aggressively — you can always export later; unexporting is a breaking change. → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill to unexport safely — its rename updates every call site atomically and refuses the change when lowercasing a method would break interface satisfaction, a breakage grep/sed silently ships.

String Handling

Use strconv for simple conversions (faster), fmt.Sprintf for complex formatting. Use %q in error messages to make string boundaries visible. Use strings.Builder for loops, + for simple concatenation.

Type Conversions

Prefer explicit, narrow conversions. Use generics over any when a concrete type will do:

func Contains[T comparable](slice []T, target T) bool  // not []any

Philosophy

  • "A little copying is better than a little dependency"
  • Use slices and maps standard packages; for filter/group-by/chunk, use github.com/samber/lo
  • "Reflection is never clear" — avoid reflect unless necessary
  • Don't abstract prematurely — extract when the pattern is stable
  • Minimize public surface — every exported name is a commitment

Parallelizing Code Style Reviews

When reviewing code style across a large codebase, use up to 5 parallel sub-agents (via the Agent tool), each targeting an independent style concern (e.g. control flow, function design, variable declarations, string handling, code organization).

Enforce with Linters

Many rules are enforced automatically: gofmt, gofumpt, goimports, gocritic, revive, wsl_v5. → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill.

Cross-References

  • → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming skill for identifier naming conventions
  • → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill for pointer vs value receivers, interface design
  • → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns skill for functional options, builders, constructors
  • → See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for automated formatting enforcement
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration skill for automated AI-driven code review in CI using these guidelines
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-refactoring skill for mechanically applying guard-clause conversion, function extraction, and options-struct migration safely across many call sites once a review surfaces violations at scale

Mais skills de samber

golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text is a description of a skill for Golang testing. We must preserve the name "golang-testing" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. Also preserve technical terms like "table-driven tests", "testify suites", "mocks", "parallel tests", "fuzzing", "fixtures", "goroutine leak detection", "goleak", "snapshot testing", "code coverage", "integration tests", "idiomatic test naming", "Go test CI", "flaky/slow tests", "testify-specific APIs", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify", "measurement methodology". Also preserve URLs? There is no URL. Numbers? None. So just translate the surrounding Portuguese text naturally. The text: "Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage,
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Padrões de design idiomáticos em Golang — opções funcionais, construtores, fluxo e cascata de erros, gerenciamento e ciclo de vida de recursos, desligamento gracioso, resiliência, arquitetura, injeção de dependência, manipulação de dados, streaming e mais. Aplicar ao escolher explicitamente entre padrões arquiteturais, implementar opções funcionais, projetar APIs de construtores, configurar desligamento gracioso, aplicar padrões de resiliência ou perguntar qual padrão idiomático Go se adequa a um problema específico.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Padrões e metodologia de otimização de desempenho em Golang - se gargalo X, então aplique Y. Abrange redução de alocação, eficiência de CPU, layout de memória, ajuste de GC, pooling, caching e otimização de hot-path. Use quando profiling ou benchmarks identificaram um gargalo e você precisa do padrão de otimização correto para corrigi-lo. Use também ao realizar revisão de código de desempenho para sugerir melhorias ou benchmarks que possam ajudar a identificar ganhos rápidos de desempenho. Não é para metodologia de medição (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Práticas recomendadas de segurança e prevenção de vulnerabilidades para Golang. Aborda injeção (SQL, comando, XSS), criptografia, segurança de sistema de arquivos, segurança de rede, cookies, gerenciamento de segredos, segurança de memória e registro. Aplicar ao escrever, revisar ou auditar código Go para segurança, ou ao trabalhar em qualquer código arriscado envolvendo criptografia, E/S, gerenciamento de segredos, manipulação de entrada do usuário ou autenticação. Inclui configuração de ferramentas de segurança.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Guia abrangente para acesso a banco de dados em Go — consultas parametrizadas, escaneamento de structs, colunas anuláveis, transações, níveis de isolamento, SELECT FOR UPDATE, pool de conexões, processamento em lote, propagação de contexto e ferramentas de migração. Use ao escrever, revisar ou depurar código Golang que interage com PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL ou SQLite; para testes de banco de dados; ou para dúvidas sobre database/sql, sqlx ou pgx. NÃO gera esquemas de banco de dados ou SQL de migração.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Melhores práticas de linting e configuração do golangci-lint para projetos Golang — execução de linters, configuração do .golangci.yml, supressão de avisos com diretivas nolint, interpretação da saída de lint e seleção de linters. Use ao configurar o golangci-lint, ao perguntar sobre avisos de lint ou supressões nolint, ao configurar ferramentas de qualidade de código ou ao escolher linters. Use também quando o usuário mencionar golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck ou revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting
golang-troubleshooting
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text is a description of a skill named "golang-troubleshooting". The instruction says to preserve the name if it appears in the source text, but the name "golang-troubleshooting" does not appear in the provided text. The text starts with "Troubleshoot Golang programs systematically..." So we translate that. Also preserve technical terms like "pprof", "Delve debugger", "GODEBUG", etc. The text mentions a reference to another skill: "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark" - preserve that exactly. Also note the arrow "→" and the word "skill" in parentheses. We'll translate the surrounding text but keep the reference intact. The target language is Portuguese (Brazil). We need to produce a natural translation. Let's break down the text: "Troubleshoot Golang programs systematically - find and fix the root cause. Use when encountering bugs, crashes, deadlocks, or unexpected behavior in Go code
developmenttesting