to-tickets

Quebre um plano, especificação ou a conversa atual em um conjunto de tickets tracer-bullet, cada um declarando suas arestas de bloqueio, publicados no tracker configurado — arestas como texto em um arquivo por ticket localmente, ou links de bloqueio nativos em um tracker real.

npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets

To Tickets

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into a set of tickets — tracer-bullet vertical slices, each declaring the tickets that block it.

The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.

Process

1. Gather context

Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes a reference (a spec path, an issue number or URL) as an argument, fetch it and read its full body and comments.

2. Explore the codebase (optional)

If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Ticket titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.

Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."

3. Draft vertical slices

Break the work into tracer bullet tickets.

  • Each slice cuts a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests) — vertical, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer
  • A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
  • Each slice is sized to fit in a single fresh context window
  • Any prefactoring should be done first

Give each ticket its blocking edges — the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.

Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing. A wide refactor is one mechanical change — rename a column, retype a shared symbol — whose blast radius fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a tracer bullet; sequence it as expand–contract. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket — green is promised only there.

4. Quiz the user

Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:

  • Title: short descriptive name
  • Blocked by: which other tickets (if any) must complete first
  • What it delivers: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work

Ask the user:

  • Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
  • Are the blocking edges correct — does each ticket only depend on tickets that genuinely gate it?
  • Should any tickets be merged or split further?

Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.

5. Publish the tickets to the configured tracker

Publish the approved tickets. How depends on the tracker /setup-matt-pocock-skills configured — the tickets are the same either way, only the shape of the blocking edges changes:

  • Local files → write one file per ticket under .scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md, numbered from 01 in dependency order (blockers first). Each file's "Blocked by" lists the numbers/titles it depends on. Use the per-ticket file template below — one ticket per file, never a single combined file.
  • A real issue tracker (GitHub, Linear, …) → publish one issue per ticket in dependency order (blockers first) so each ticket's blocking edges can reference real identifiers. Use the platform's native blocking / sub-issue relationship where it has one; otherwise set each ticket's "Blocked by" to the blocking issues. Apply the ready-for-agent triage label unless instructed otherwise — the tickets are agent-grabbable by construction.

Work the frontier: any ticket whose blockers are all done. For a purely linear chain that means top to bottom.

Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.

What to build: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not a layer-by-layer implementation list.

Blocked by: the numbers/titles of the tickets that gate this one, or "None — can start immediately".

Status: ready-for-agent

  • Acceptance criterion 1
  • Acceptance criterion 2

Parent

A reference to the parent issue on the tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).

What to build

The end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not layer-by-layer implementation.

Acceptance criteria

  • Criterion 1
  • Criterion 2

Blocked by

  • A reference to each blocking ticket, or "None — can start immediately".

In either form, avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.

Mais skills de mattpocock

improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock
Encontre oportunidades de aprofundamento em uma base de código, informado pela linguagem de domínio em CONTEXT.md e pelas decisões em docs/adr/. Use quando o usuário quiser melhorar a arquitetura, encontrar oportunidades de refatoração, consolidar módulos fortemente acoplados ou tornar uma base de código mais testável e navegável por IA.
developmentcode-reviewapi
tdd
mattpocock
Desenvolvimento orientado a testes com ciclo red-green-refactor. Use quando o usuário quiser construir funcionalidades ou corrigir bugs usando TDD, mencionar "red-green-refactor", quiser testes de integração ou pedir desenvolvimento orientado a testes.
developmenttesting
handoff
mattpocock
Compacte a conversa atual em um documento de handoff para que outro agente possa continuar.
communicationproject-managementdocument
prototype
mattpocock
Construa um protótipo descartável para desenvolver um design antes de se comprometer com ele. Roteia entre dois ramos — um aplicativo de terminal executável para questões de estado/lógica de negócios, ou várias variações de UI radicalmente diferentes alternáveis a partir de uma rota. Use quando o usuário quiser prototipar, verificar um modelo de dados ou máquina de estado, criar um mockup de UI, explorar opções de design, ou disser "prototipe isso", "deixe-me brincar com isso", "tente alguns designs".
developmentdesigncreative
triage
mattpocock
Triar problemas através de uma máquina de estados orientada por funções de triagem. Use quando o usuário quiser criar um problema, triar problemas, revisar bugs ou solicitações de funcionalidades recebidas, preparar problemas para um agente AFK ou gerenciar o fluxo de trabalho de problemas.
developmentproject-managementcommunication
obsidian-vault
mattpocock
Pesquise, crie e gerencie notas no vault do Obsidian com wikilinks e notas de índice. Use quando o usuário quiser encontrar, criar ou organizar notas no Obsidian.
productivitydocument
edit-article
mattpocock
Edite e melhore artigos reestruturando seções, aprimorando a clareza e refinando a prosa. Use quando o usuário quiser editar, revisar ou melhorar um rascunho de artigo.
documentcreative
writing-great-skills
mattpocock
Referência para escrever e editar skills bem — o vocabulário e os princípios que tornam uma skill previsível.
documentdevelopment