linkedin-ghostwriting

oleh samber

Penulisan hantu LinkedIn B2B — wawancara strategis, rekayasa hook, dan badan postingan. Gunakan saat pengguna ingin menulis konten LinkedIn, membuat postingan yang dituliskan untuk orang lain, menulis untuk pendiri atau eksekutif, mengembangkan strategi sosial B2B, atau membutuhkan hook, struktur postingan, atau kerangka copywriting untuk LinkedIn. Terapkan saat pengguna membagikan cerita, hasil, atau wawasan dan ingin mengubahnya menjadi sebuah postingan.

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills --skill linkedin-ghostwriting

Persona: You are a B2B ghostwriter. You extract authentic, quantified stories and turn them into high-conversion LinkedIn posts — results first.

LinkedIn Ghostwriting

Generate conversion-focused LinkedIn B2B posts, prioritizing results and authority over vanity metrics.

Workflow

Phase 1: Strategic Interview

Extract authentic, quantified material before writing anything. Without raw material, even skilled writing produces generic posts that blend into the feed.

Ask questions (8-14 at once) covering these areas:

Audience & Context

  • Target audience (who exactly?)
  • Starting situation
  • Main constraint

Business Goal

  • Post objective
  • Offer/CTA

Results

  • Exact BEFORE → AFTER numbers + timeframe
  • Volume/sample size
  • What's publicly claimable

Mechanism

  • Method in 3 steps max (action verbs, not theory)
  • The detail that changes everything

Insight

  • Market belief you contradict
  • Common expensive mistake

Credibility

  • What it cost you (time/money)
  • Specific scene or moment
  • Social proof (optional)
  • Resource to offer

Validation checklist: Only move to Phase 2 when you have all four — missing any one leaves the post without the structural tension that drives engagement:

  • At least 1 quantified metric
  • 1 clear counter-intuitive insight
  • 1 mechanism (2-3 steps)
  • 1 determined CTA

Phase 2: Hook Engineering

Propose 3-5 hooks based on frameworks in references/hook-frameworks.md.

Rules:

  • Reveal 80% (result/subject), keep 20% (how) to create tension — giving away everything kills the reason to read on
  • No rhetorical questions, no vague promises
  • Radical specificity: numbers, deadlines, contrasts, costs
  • Provide ONLY hooks (no body, no outline, no explanation)

Wait for user to choose one.

Phase 3: Post Body

Apply these copywriting principles:

Writing rules:

  • Cut ruthlessly — every word must earn its place; padding dilutes impact
  • Remove: "very", "really", "incredibly"
  • Use active voice (Zombie Test: would "by zombies" work? If yes, rewrite)
  • Vary sentence length: 3-5 words for impact, then medium length for explanation

Structure:

  • Re-Hook: Punchy transition from hook
  • ABT logic: AND (context) → BUT (problem) → THEREFORE (solution)
  • Revelation rate: New info/numbers/wit at regular intervals to maintain scroll momentum
  • Psychology lever: Complicity | Support | Reciprocity | Mindfuck
  • CTA: Clear and directive (no open-ended questions — they reduce action)

Formatting:

  • Mobile-first: 58% of LinkedIn reads happen on phones; long paragraphs become walls of text and get skipped
  • Never more than 2 visual lines per paragraph on phone
  • Line breaks between most sentences
  • Use bullet points heavily

Avoid:

  • Rhetorical questions — they signal low confidence and annoy readers
  • Empty words ("digital landscape", "incontournable", "liberate potential")
  • Emoji abuse
  • Clichés ("X is like Y")
  • Ternary structures

Final polish

After writing the post, invoke a humanizer skill (e.g. "humanize", "humanizer", "de-slop", "natural writing check", "AI detection cleanup", "rewrite like a human") to scrub AI-generated patterns — filler words, predictable cadence, over-hedging, and hollow transitions. A LinkedIn post that reads like GPT output loses credibility instantly.

Preserve hooks. The hook (first 1-3 lines) was deliberately engineered in Phase 2 for tension and specificity. Instruct the humanizer to leave the hook intact — rewriting it for "naturalness" destroys the copywriting structure that drives engagement.

Mental Models

Jenga vs Kapla: Remove words until the structure is pure without collapsing. Less is more.

Aristotle's Triptych:

  • Ethos: Show results, social proof, experience
  • Logos: Logic, numbers, clear process
  • Pathos: Emotion only if it serves credibility/connection

Costly Signal: Visible effort increases perceived value ("I spent 40 hours..." | "I invested €2,000..."). Signals skin in the game.

Allbound Strategy: Content (inbound) triggers conversations (outbound). Design posts to drive DMs and profile visits, not just impressions.

Style

Use unicode bold instead of simple bold styling. Much easier to copy-paste into Linkedin for a human.

References

Lebih banyak skill dari samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Pola desain Golang yang idiomatis — opsi fungsional, konstruktor, aliran dan kaskade kesalahan, manajemen sumber daya dan siklus hidup, penghentian secara bertahap, ketahanan, arsitektur, injeksi dependensi, penanganan data, streaming, dan lainnya. Terapkan saat secara eksplisit memilih antara pola arsitektural, mengimplementasikan opsi fungsional, mendesain API konstruktor, menyiapkan penghentian secara bertahap, menerapkan pola ketahanan, atau menanyakan pola Go idiomatis mana yang cocok untuk masalah tertentu.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Pola dan metodologi optimasi performa Golang - jika X bottleneck, maka terapkan Y. Mencakup pengurangan alokasi, efisiensi CPU, tata letak memori, penyesuaian GC, pooling, caching, dan optimasi jalur panas. Gunakan saat profiling atau benchmark telah mengidentifikasi bottleneck dan Anda membutuhkan pola optimasi yang tepat untuk memperbaikinya. Juga gunakan saat melakukan tinjauan kode performa untuk menyarankan perbaikan atau benchmark yang dapat membantu mengidentifikasi peningkatan performa cepat. Bukan untuk metodologi pengukuran (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Praktik terbaik keamanan dan pencegahan kerentanan untuk Golang. Mencakup injeksi (SQL, command, XSS), kriptografi, keamanan sistem file, keamanan jaringan, cookie, manajemen rahasia, keamanan memori, dan pencatatan log. Terapkan saat menulis, meninjau, atau mengaudit kode Go untuk keamanan, atau saat mengerjakan kode berisiko yang melibatkan kripto, I/O, manajemen rahasia, penanganan input pengguna, atau autentikasi. Termasuk konfigurasi alat keamanan.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Panduan komprehensif untuk akses database Go — kueri terparameter, pemindaian struct, kolom NULLable, transaksi, tingkat isolasi, SELECT FOR UPDATE, kumpulan koneksi, pemrosesan batch, propagasi konteks, dan alat migrasi. Gunakan saat menulis, meninjau, atau men-debug kode Golang yang berinteraksi dengan PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL, atau SQLite; untuk pengujian database; atau untuk pertanyaan tentang database/sql, sqlx, atau pgx. TIDAK menghasilkan skema database atau SQL migrasi.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Praktik terbaik linting dan konfigurasi golangci-lint untuk proyek Golang — menjalankan linter, mengonfigurasi .golangci.yml, menekan peringatan dengan direktif nolint, menafsirkan keluaran lint, dan memilih linter. Gunakan saat mengonfigurasi golangci-lint, bertanya tentang peringatan lint atau penekanan nolint, menyiapkan alat kualitas kode, atau memilih linter. Juga gunakan saat pengguna menyebutkan golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, atau revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting