golang-spf13-cobra

oleh samber

We need to translate the given text from English to Bahasa Indonesia. The text describes a Golang CLI command tree library using spf13/cobra. It lists various features: cobra.Command, RunE vs Run, PersistentPreRunE hook chain, Args validators, persistent vs local flags, command groups, ValidArgsFunction, RegisterFlagCompletionFunc, ShellCompDirective, usage/help template customization, man-page and markdown doc generation, and testing with SetArgs/SetOut/SetErr. Also mentions when to apply. We must preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Golang", "spf13/cobra", "cobra.Command", "RunE", "Run", "PersistentPreRunE", "Args", "NoArgs", "ExactArgs", "MatchAll", "ValidArgsFunction", "RegisterFlagCompletionFunc", "ShellCompDirective", "SetArgs", "SetOut", "SetErr", "github.com/spf13/cobra" should remain as is. Also "man-page

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-spf13-cobra

Persona: You are a Go CLI engineer building command trees that feel native to the Unix shell. You design the user-facing surface first, then wire behavior into the right hook.

Modes:

  • Build — creating a new CLI from scratch: follow command tree setup, hook wiring, and flag sections sequentially.
  • Extend — adding subcommands, flags, or completions to an existing CLI: read the current command tree first, then apply changes consistent with the existing structure.
  • Review — auditing an existing CLI: check the Common Mistakes table, verify RunE usage, OutOrStdout(), hook chain ordering, and args validation.

Using spf13/cobra for CLI command trees in Go

Cobra is the de facto standard for Go CLI applications. It provides the command/subcommand tree, flag parsing (via pflag), args validation, shell completion generation, and documentation generation. It does not handle configuration layering — that's viper's job.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

go get github.com/spf13/cobra@latest

Cobra vs. viper

These libraries do fundamentally different things and can be used independently.

Concerncobraviper
OwnsCommand tree, flags, arg validation, completionsConfiguration value resolution
User-facing?Yes — subcommands, flags, help textNo — purely a key-value resolver
Without the other?Yes — a CLI with flags only needs cobraYes — a daemon reading YAML + env needs only viper
Integration seamHands pflag.Flag to viper via BindPFlagTreats the cobra flag as the highest-precedence layer

Use cobra alone when your binary takes flags and args but needs no config file or env resolution. Use viper alone when you have a long-running service reading config from YAML + env with no CLI subcommands. Use both when you need both — bind at PersistentPreRunE on the root command.

→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-viper for the viper side of this integration.

Command tree

Every cobra CLI has a root command plus zero or more subcommands registered with AddCommand. The root command name is the binary name.

var rootCmd = &cobra.Command{
    Use:          "myapp",
    Short:        "One-line summary",
    SilenceUsage: true,  // ✓ prevents usage wall on every error
    SilenceErrors: true, // ✓ lets you control error output format
}

Use AddGroup to label subcommands in help output — register groups before the AddCommand calls that reference them; cobra does not retroactively assign groups.

The Run* family

Cobra commands have five run hooks executed in order:

PersistentPreRunE → PreRunE → RunE → PostRunE → PersistentPostRunE

Always use *E variants — the non-E forms cannot return errors. Key rules:

  • PersistentPreRunE on the root runs before every subcommand — use it for config init and auth checks.
  • A child PersistentPreRunE replaces the parent's entirely — call the parent explicitly if you need both.
  • PostRunE runs only if RunE succeeded.

For the full lifecycle and inheritance rules, see commands-and-args.md.

Args validators

Cobra validates positional arguments before RunE runs. Never write len(args) checks inside RunE — that bypasses cobra's standard error messages and arg count tracking.

Built-ins: NoArgs, ExactArgs(n), MinimumNArgs(n), MaximumNArgs(n), RangeArgs(min,max), OnlyValidArgs, ExactValidArgs(n). Compose with MatchAll(v1, v2). Custom validator: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error.

For the full validator set with examples and MatchAll patterns, see commands-and-args.md.

Flags primer

Cobra delegates flag parsing to pflag. Persistent flags (PersistentFlags()) are inherited by all subcommands; local flags (Flags()) apply only to the declaring command.

rootCmd.PersistentFlags().StringVar(&cfgFile, "config", "", "config file path") // inherited by all subcommands
serveCmd.Flags().IntVar(&port, "port", 8080, "listen port")                     // local to serveCmd only
serveCmd.MarkFlagRequired("port")
serveCmd.MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive("json", "yaml")

For pflag types, custom flag values, flag groups, and viper binding, see flags.md.

Completions primer

Cobra generates shell completions automatically. Extend them with:

  • ValidArgs []string — static positional arg completion.
  • ValidArgsFunction — dynamic: func(cmd, args, toComplete string) ([]string, ShellCompDirective). Return ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp to suppress file fallback.
  • RegisterFlagCompletionFunc(name, fn) — flag value completion.

For ShellCompDirective values, annotations, and testing, see completions.md.

Testing commands

Test commands by executing them programmatically. Never use os.Stdout / os.Stderr directly in command handlers — use cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr() so tests can redirect output.

func TestServeCmd(t *testing.T) {
    buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
    rootCmd.SetOut(buf)
    rootCmd.SetArgs([]string{"serve", "--port", "9090"})
    require.NoError(t, rootCmd.Execute())
    assert.Contains(t, buf.String(), "listening on :9090")
}

Cobra accumulates flag state across Execute() calls — build a fresh command tree per test. For isolation patterns, golden files, and testing completions, see testing.md.

Best Practices

  1. Always use RunE, never RunRun cannot return an error; the only escape is os.Exit or panic, bypassing defers.
  2. Put config initialization in PersistentPreRunE — it runs before every subcommand; the right place for viper binding and auth checks.
  3. Validate positional args with Args, not inside RunEArgs gives cobra's standard error messages; MatchAll composes validators.
  4. Use cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr() for all output — direct os.Stdout writes cannot be captured by tests.
  5. Re-create the command tree per test — cobra accumulates flag state across Execute() calls on the same instance.

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy it failsFix
Using Run instead of RunECannot return an error — only escape is os.Exit or panic, bypassing defersUse RunE — return the error, let cobra handle the exit
Writing len(args) checks in RunEBypasses cobra's standard error messages ("accepts 1 arg, received 2")Declare Args: cobra.ExactArgs(1) on the command
Writing to os.Stdout directlyTests cannot capture output — os-level file handles can't be redirectedUse cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr()
Child PersistentPreRunE silently drops parent'sCobra does not chain — the child replaces the parent's hook entirelyCall parent.PersistentPreRunE(cmd, args) from the child's hook
Reusing a root command across testsCobra accumulates flag state; second Execute() sees flags from the firstBuild a fresh command tree per test

Further Reading

  • commands-and-args.md — full PreRun*/PostRun* chain, every Args validator, PersistentPreRunE inheritance rules
  • flags.md — pflag types, required/exclusive/oneRequired groups, custom value types, viper binding
  • completions.md — ShellCompDirective set, annotation-based completions, testing completions
  • generators.md — man page, markdown, YAML, RST doc generation; cobra-cli scaffolder
  • testing.md — isolation patterns, golden files, testing completions, table-driven command tests

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-cli skill for general CLI architecture — project layout, exit codes, signal handling, I/O patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-viper skill for configuration layering alongside cobra (flag → env → file → default precedence)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general Go testing patterns

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in spf13/cobra, open an issue at https://github.com/spf13/cobra/issues.

Lebih banyak skill dari samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Bahasa Indonesia. The instruction says to preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The name "golang-testing" is not in the text, so we don't include it. The text contains terms like "Golang", "testify", "goleak", "CI", "API", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify" which should be preserved as is. Also numbers and technical terms like "table-driven tests", "parallel tests", "fuzzing", "fixtures", "goroutine leak detection", "snapshot testing", "code coverage", "integration tests", "idiomatic test naming" should be translated appropriately but keep the technical essence. The instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear, so we ignore. Also no labels like "description". Just translate the text. Let's translate: "Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Pola desain Golang yang idiomatis — opsi fungsional, konstruktor, aliran dan kaskade kesalahan, manajemen sumber daya dan siklus hidup, penghentian secara bertahap, ketahanan, arsitektur, injeksi dependensi, penanganan data, streaming, dan lainnya. Terapkan saat secara eksplisit memilih antara pola arsitektural, mengimplementasikan opsi fungsional, mendesain API konstruktor, menyiapkan penghentian secara bertahap, menerapkan pola ketahanan, atau menanyakan pola Go idiomatis mana yang cocok untuk masalah tertentu.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Bahasa Indonesia, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" but only if it appears in the source text. The source text does not contain the name "golang-error-handling" explicitly; it only appears in the instruction as the name to preserve. The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should not add it. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text includes terms like "Golang", "%w", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "slog", "HTTP", "samber/oops", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops". These should remain as is. Translate the rest idiomatically. The text: "Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Pola dan metodologi optimasi performa Golang - jika X bottleneck, maka terapkan Y. Mencakup pengurangan alokasi, efisiensi CPU, tata letak memori, penyesuaian GC, pooling, caching, dan optimasi jalur panas. Gunakan saat profiling atau benchmark telah mengidentifikasi bottleneck dan Anda membutuhkan pola optimasi yang tepat untuk memperbaikinya. Juga gunakan saat melakukan tinjauan kode performa untuk menyarankan perbaikan atau benchmark yang dapat membantu mengidentifikasi peningkatan performa cepat. Bukan untuk metodologi pengukuran (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Praktik terbaik keamanan dan pencegahan kerentanan untuk Golang. Mencakup injeksi (SQL, command, XSS), kriptografi, keamanan sistem file, keamanan jaringan, cookie, manajemen rahasia, keamanan memori, dan pencatatan log. Terapkan saat menulis, meninjau, atau mengaudit kode Go untuk keamanan, atau saat mengerjakan kode berisiko yang melibatkan kripto, I/O, manajemen rahasia, penanganan input pengguna, atau autentikasi. Termasuk konfigurasi alat keamanan.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Panduan komprehensif untuk akses database Go — kueri terparameter, pemindaian struct, kolom NULLable, transaksi, tingkat isolasi, SELECT FOR UPDATE, kumpulan koneksi, pemrosesan batch, propagasi konteks, dan alat migrasi. Gunakan saat menulis, meninjau, atau men-debug kode Golang yang berinteraksi dengan PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL, atau SQLite; untuk pengujian database; atau untuk pertanyaan tentang database/sql, sqlx, atau pgx. TIDAK menghasilkan skema database atau SQL migrasi.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Praktik terbaik linting dan konfigurasi golangci-lint untuk proyek Golang — menjalankan linter, mengonfigurasi .golangci.yml, menekan peringatan dengan direktif nolint, menafsirkan keluaran lint, dan memilih linter. Gunakan saat mengonfigurasi golangci-lint, bertanya tentang peringatan lint atau penekanan nolint, menyiapkan alat kualitas kode, atau memilih linter. Juga gunakan saat pengguna menyebutkan golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, atau revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting