ai-research-reproduction

Orkestrator mode reproduksi RigorPilot untuk reproduksi repositori deep learning yang mengutamakan README. Gunakan saat pengguna menginginkan alur menyeluruh yang dapat dipercaya secara minimal, yang membaca repositori terlebih dahulu, memilih target inferensi atau evaluasi terdokumentasi terkecil, mengoordinasikan penerimaan, pengaturan, eksekusi tepercaya, pelatihan tepercaya opsional, analisis repositori opsional, dan resolusi celah makalah opsional, menerapkan aturan tambalan konservatif, mencatat bukti, asumsi, penyimpangan, dan titik keputusan manusia,...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Guide README-first deep learning reproduction toward a minimal trustworthy run with auditable evidence. Reproduction is not "make it run by changing anything"; faithfully read the README, environment, weights, datasets, and documented commands, then record results and deviations. Start with references/agent-operating-principles.md; load references/research-rigor-principles.md and references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when scientific meaning or experiment details are at stake.

For first-use problems, run scripts/doctor.py with the intended Python (read-only; optional --repo and --require-module). The deterministic entrypoint is scripts/orchestrate_repro.py with a self-contained _bundled/ runtime, so this skill works when installed alone; separately installed companion skills remain optional reusable entrypoints. Use the entrypoint and --help for routine runs; inspect its implementation when a concrete blocker or safety question requires it. Executed commands persist lifecycle state, append-only events, and full streamed stdout/stderr under repro_outputs/_runtime/<run_id>/. A CANCEL file in the active run directory requests process-tree cancellation. For recovery, queues or model gates, read references/runtime-and-model-adapter.md; for the optional model/tool loop, read references/agent-runner.md and use scripts/run_agent.py.

Fit

Use this skill when all are true:

  • The target is an AI code repository with a README, scripts, configs, or documented commands.
  • The request spans multiple trusted phases such as intake, setup, execution, training verification, analysis, paper-gap resolution, and reporting.
  • The desired result is a small reproducible target, not broad experimentation.

Do not use this skill for paper summaries, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, open-ended research design, or explicit candidate-only exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Read the README and nearby repo signals.
  2. Run the bundled repo-intake-and-plan stage to extract commands and targets.
  3. Select and justify the minimum trustworthy target.
  4. Run env-and-assets-bootstrap only for target-specific environment, checkpoint, dataset, and cache assumptions.
  5. Run analyze-project only when structure, insertion points, or suspicious implementation patterns need read-only clarification.
  6. Use minimal-run-and-audit for documented inference, evaluation, smoke, or sanity execution. Keep direct execution as the default; native shell syntax requires explicit review and authorization.
  7. Use run-train instead when the selected trusted target is training startup, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume.
  8. Pause for human review before fuller training claims or any change that could alter dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or result interpretation.
  9. Award result-match only when explicit expected metrics are compared under a recorded tolerance; observed metrics alone prove execution, not reproduction. Then write the standardized outputs and a concise final note in the user's language when practical.
  10. Once the requested target and evidence checks are complete, return the bounded result and stop. Optional stages and further README commands are not automatic follow-up work.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
ANNOTATED_README.md   # original README + colored per-section agent-action annotations
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and the field rules in references/output-spec.md.

  • Put the shortest high-value summary in SUMMARY.md.
  • Put copyable commands in COMMANDS.md.
  • Put process evidence, assumptions, failures, and decisions in LOG.md.
  • Put scientific meaning and change effects in SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md.
  • Put comparison anchors and protocol deviations in COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md.
  • Put durable machine-readable state in status.json.
  • Put branch, commit, validation, and README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md when needed.
  • Put the researcher's at-a-glance view in ANNOTATED_README.md: the README replayed byte-for-byte—including its image, GIF, video, and HTML markup—with exactly one marked color annotation after every heading block. Never extract a text-only surrogate. Generation must pass the built-in strip/check round trip before the file is kept.
  • For original relative media/file context, use --source-adjacent-readme to also write RIGORPILOT_README.md beside the source README; inspect the reported path/status and never replace an unrelated existing file. See references/output-spec.md.
  • Distinguish verified facts from inferred guesses.

Reference Loading

  • Load references/language-policy.md when writing human-readable outputs.
  • Load references/research-rigor-principles.md before making comparability, contribution, or research-result claims.
  • Load references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when dataset, split, metric, checkpoint, training, or evaluation details matter.
  • Consult ~/.rigorpilot/PERSONAL_RIGOR.md if present, under references/continuous-learning-policy.md (advisory only; core wins).
  • Failed and later-resolved runs are auto-recorded as lessons via shared/scripts/lessons_store.py (RIGORPILOT_LESSONS=0 disables).
  • Load references/research-safety-principles.md before protocol-sensitive decisions.
  • Load references/patch-policy.md before modifying repository files.
  • Keep specialized logic in sub-skills, scripts, templates, or references rather than expanding this entrypoint.

Lebih banyak skill dari lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding,...
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Keterampilan hanya-baca Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit untuk repositori riset pembelajaran mendalam. Gunakan ketika pengguna ingin membaca dan memahami repositori, memeriksa struktur model serta titik masuk pelatihan atau inferensi, meninjau konfigurasi dan titik penyisipan, atau menandai pola implementasi yang mencurigakan tanpa memodifikasi kode atau menjalankan pekerjaan berat. Jangan gunakan untuk eksekusi perintah aktif, refaktorisasi luas, adaptasi kode spekulatif, atau perbaikan bug otomatis.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted...
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Keterampilan Rigor Setup untuk reproduksi repositori deep learning yang mengutamakan README. Gunakan ketika tugas secara spesifik adalah menyiapkan lingkungan conda-first yang konservatif, asumsi jalur checkpoint dan dataset, petunjuk lokasi cache, serta catatan pengaturan sebelum menjalankan repositori yang didokumentasikan dengan README. Jangan gunakan untuk pemindaian repositori, orkestrasi penuh, interpretasi makalah, pelaporan hasil akhir, atau pengaturan lingkungan generik yang tidak terkait dengan target reproduksi tertentu.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Bahasa Indonesia. The text is a description of an agent skill named "explore-run". The instruction says to preserve the name "explore-run" if it appears in the source text. It does appear: "explore-run leaf skill" and "explore_outputs/". Also "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore" might be names? The instruction says preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. "Rigor Improve" and "Rigor Explore" might be product names or skill names. The instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should keep "Rigor Improve", "Rigor Explore", "explore-run", "explore_outputs/". Also "fair-comparison caveats" and "no-overclaim summaries" are technical terms. We need to translate the rest naturally. Let's break down the text: "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill for bounded exploratory evidence in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Keterampilan Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit untuk pekerjaan riset pembelajaran mendalam. Gunakan ketika pengguna menempelkan traceback, error terminal, CUDA OOM, kegagalan muat checkpoint, ketidakcocokan bentuk, gejala kehilangan NaN, atau kegagalan pelatihan dan menginginkan diagnosis konservatif sebelum melakukan penambalan apa pun, dengan perbaikan debug yang dipisahkan secara jelas dari kontribusi riset. Jangan gunakan untuk refaktorisasi luas, adaptasi spekulatif, penambalan eksploratif otomatis, atau pengenalan repositori umum.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Pembantu Konteks Paper Rigor untuk reproduksi repositori deep learning yang mengutamakan README. Gunakan hanya ketika file README dan repositori menyisakan celah sempit yang kritis untuk reproduksi dan tugasnya adalah menyelesaikan detail spesifik paper seperti pembagian dataset, pra-pemrosesan, protokol evaluasi, pemetaan checkpoint, atau asumsi runtime dari sumber paper utama sambil mencatat konflik. Jangan gunakan untuk ringkasan paper umum, pemindaian repositori, pengaturan lingkungan, eksekusi perintah, pencarian paper hanya berdasarkan judul, atau...
researchdocumentdata-analysis