research

Delegate noisy investigation to one or more subagents so the orchestrator's context stays clean, then work from the distilled answer. Use this skill whenever answering a question would require reading many files, long logs, large diffs, or wide codebase surveys — i.e. when producing the answer generates far more noise than the answer itself. Use it for "how does X work", "where is Y used", "what's the root cause of Z", "summarize this PR/log" style questions, and reach for it liberally...

npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills --skill research

Research

Use this skill to answer a question by delegating the work of finding the answer to a subagent, so that the byproducts of that work — file contents, log noise, dead-end reads — never enter your own context. You get back a distilled answer plus the evidence that supports it, and you stay sharp for the actual task.

Why this matters

Your context window is your most valuable and limited resource. Reading twenty files to discover that three of them mattered permanently pollutes your context with seventeen files of noise, degrading every subsequent decision you make. A subagent absorbs that noise on your behalf and hands you only the signal. Think of it as asking a colleague to dig through the archives and report back, rather than dumping the whole archive on your desk.

When to use it

Reach for research delegation when the cost of producing the answer is far greater than the answer itself. Strong signals:

  • You'd need to read many files to find the few that are relevant.
  • You'd need to wade through long test output, CI logs, or stack traces to extract a failure.
  • You'd need to survey how a pattern, API, or symbol is used across the whole repo.
  • You'd need to read and summarize a large diff or PR.
  • The question has several independent sub-parts that could be investigated separately.

Examples — good fits:

  • "What's the root cause of this failing test?" (the subagent reads the logs and traces the code; you get the cause)
  • "How is SessionManager used across the codebase?" (the subagent greps and reads; you get a summary with call sites)
  • "Summarize what this 4,000-line PR changes and why." (the subagent reads the diff; you get the shape of it)

Examples — do NOT delegate:

  • Reading 2–3 files you already know you need. Just read them directly; delegation adds latency for no context savings.
  • A single grep or one-line lookup. Do it yourself.
  • Anything where you need the raw material for your next step. If you're about to edit the files you'd be reading, delegating is counterproductive — you'd just have to re-read them yourself to make the change. Research delegation pays off when the output is a conclusion, not when it's material you'll work on directly.

The cost of a subagent is real (latency and tokens), so the test is always: does the noise I'd avoid outweigh that cost?

How to do it

Single vs. parallel

Default to a single subagent. Spawn multiple subagents in parallel only when the question genuinely decomposes into independent sub-parts that don't need to share intermediate findings — for example, "how does auth work AND how does billing work AND how does the rate limiter work" are three independent investigations that can run at once. Parallelism is a capability worth using when the parts are truly independent, since separate subagents can investigate simultaneously; but don't force a single coherent question into artificial fragments.

Brief the subagent well

The subagent does not share your intent, so spell it out. A good research brief includes:

  • The exact question to answer.
  • Where to look (repo path, branch, suspected files/symbols if you know them).
  • That it is read-only — it should investigate and report, not modify files, unless the task explicitly calls for changes.
  • The output you want back (see below).

Ask for signal, not transcript

Tell the subagent to return a distilled answer plus its supporting evidence, not a raw dump. Specifically:

  1. The direct answer to the question.
  2. The key evidence: exact file paths and symbols (e.g. src/session.rs:142, fn reconnect), so you can jump straight to what matters.
  3. Anything surprising or any caveats/unknowns it hit.

The whole point is that the noise stays with the subagent. If a report comes back bloated, send a focused follow-up to the same subagent asking it to tighten the answer — it retains its context and can refine cheaply.

After you get the answer

Work from the distilled result. If you later find you need the underlying files to make edits, read them directly at that point — now you know exactly which ones matter, so you read three files instead of twenty.

Más skills de warpdotdev

council
warpdotdev
Ejecuta un consejo de subagentes con diversidad de modelos para investigar un mismo problema desde múltiples perspectivas, comparar hallazgos y producir una recomendación final. Usa esta habilidad siempre que el usuario solicite un consejo, segundas opiniones, múltiples agentes/modelos para evaluar una pregunta, investigación paralela, comparación de equipo rojo/equipo azul, o ayuda para decidir entre enfoques técnicos en competencia.
researchcommunicationproject-management
spec-driven-implementation
warpdotdev
Impulsar un flujo de trabajo basado en especificaciones para funcionalidades sustanciales escribiendo PRODUCT.md antes de la implementación, redactando TECH.md cuando sea necesario, y manteniendo ambas especificaciones actualizadas a medida que la implementación evoluciona. Usar al iniciar una funcionalidad significativa, al planificar una implementación impulsada por agentes, o cuando el usuario desee que las especificaciones de producto y técnicas se registren en el control de versiones.
developmentdocumentproject-management
review-pr
warpdotdev
Revisa el diff de una pull request y escribe comentarios estructurados en review.json para que el flujo de trabajo los publique. Úsalo al revisar un PR verificado desde artefactos locales como pr_diff.txt y pr_description.txt, generando una salida de revisión legible por máquina en lugar de publicar directamente en GitHub.
code-reviewdevelopment
create-pr
warpdotdev
Crear una solicitud de extracción en el repositorio warp para la rama actual. Usar cuando el usuario mencione abrir un PR, crear una solicitud de extracción, enviar cambios para revisión o preparar código para fusión.
developmentcode-review
implement-specs
warpdotdev
Implementar una funcionalidad aprobada de PRODUCT.md y TECH.md, manteniendo las especificaciones y el código alineados en el mismo PR a medida que la implementación evoluciona. Usar después de que las especificaciones del producto y técnicas sean aprobadas y el siguiente paso sea construir la funcionalidad.
developmentcode-reviewapi
cross-critique
warpdotdev
Ejecuta una segunda ronda sobre una cuestión controvertida circulando la propuesta independiente de cada subagente a los otros autores y solicitando pros y contras estructurados, luego sintetiza. Usa esta habilidad siempre que tengas múltiples propuestas u opiniones independientes sobre una decisión controvertida — compensaciones de arquitectura, desacuerdos en revisiones de código, elecciones de diseño, teorías de causa raíz en competencia — y quieras un análisis más preciso que el que producirías sintetizando por tu cuenta. Se combina naturalmente con las habilidades de consejo e investigación;...
resolve-merge-conflicts
warpdotdev
Resolve Git merge conflicts by extracting only unresolved paths, conflict hunks, and compact diffs instead of loading whole files into context. Use when a merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop stops on conflicts, when `git status` shows unmerged paths, or when files contain conflict markers.
developmentcode-review
brandalf
warpdotdev
Guía la creación, revisión y corrección de activos con la marca Warp u Oz. Úsalo al trabajar en páginas de lanzamiento, documentación, componentes HTML/CSS, maquetas de interfaz, prompts, activos para redes sociales, textos, presentaciones o cualquier otro entregable de marca que deba verse y sonar inconfundiblemente como Warp u Oz.
designcreativemarketing