ai-research-reproduction

Orquestador en modo de reproducción de RigorPilot para la reproducción de repositorios de aprendizaje profundo con enfoque README-first. Úsalo cuando el usuario desee un flujo integral y de mínima confianza que primero lea el repositorio, seleccione el objetivo de inferencia o evaluación documentado más pequeño, coordine la ingesta, configuración, ejecución confiable, entrenamiento confiable opcional, análisis de repositorio opcional y resolución opcional de brechas en el artículo, aplique reglas conservadoras de parches, registre evidencia, suposiciones, desviaciones y puntos de decisión humana,...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Guide README-first deep learning reproduction toward the smallest trustworthy run with auditable evidence. Preserve documented meaning; record assumptions, deviations and blockers instead of changing semantics to manufacture success. Load specialized references only for a concrete uncertainty.

Fast Path

For a routine bounded run, keep the control path short:

  1. Read the target README and only the target test/config/source needed to understand the documented command.
  2. Run scripts/orchestrate_repro.py --repo <repo> --plan-only --agent-output with any explicit user timeout bound (--timeout or --train-timeout) already supplied; review command_candidates, the selected cmd-XX, side-effect contract, selection fingerprint, and returned reviewed_run_args. With no --output-dir, later evidence goes to <repo>/repro_outputs regardless of caller cwd.
  3. Run the selected candidate, or another reviewed candidate, with --run-selected --command-id <cmd-XX> --plan-fingerprint <fingerprint> --agent-output plus requested timeout/metric/source-adjacent options. Preserve an explicit user command-timeout bound instead of silently making it stricter on a routine trusted run. --timeout limits the target command; do not wrap the whole orchestrator in an equal or shorter external timeout, because it still needs time to terminate children and write terminal evidence. A changed command set fails closed; setup/download commands are never target candidates.
  4. Run --verify-output --agent-output; inspect detailed evidence files only when verification fails or the result is partial/blocked.
  5. Deliver the bounded result and stop.

For a host with short tool-call deadlines, rerun planning with --include-agent-handoff and follow references/agent-job.md; otherwise keep the direct path above. Job completion is not task acceptance, and uncertain state is never a reason for automatic replay.

Do not inspect orchestrate_repro.py, annotate_readme.py, _bundled/, writers, or runtime internals on a normal success path. Inspect implementation only for a concrete blocker, unexpected side effect, bundle-integrity failure, or unresolved safety question. Use scripts/doctor.py for first-use environment/install diagnostics. Executed commands keep full lifecycle/log evidence under repro_outputs/_runtime/<run_id>/.

Fit

Use this skill for repository-grounded, multi-phase trusted reproduction where the goal is a small reproducible target. Do not use it for paper summaries, generic setup, isolated scanning, standalone commands, open-ended research design, or explicitly authorized candidate exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Treat README guidance as primary; extract and select the minimum trustworthy target.
  2. Use setup/assets only for target-specific prerequisites and analyze-project only when structural clarification is needed.
  3. Use minimal-run-and-audit for inference/evaluation/smoke and run-train for training startup, kickoff, or resume; direct execution is the default.
  4. Pause before fuller training or changes to dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or interpretation.
  5. Award result-match only against explicit expected metrics and tolerance; process success alone is not reproduction success.
  6. Write the evidence bundle, return the requested bounded result, and stop; optional stages are not automatic follow-up work.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
ANNOTATED_README.md   # original README + colored per-section agent-action annotations
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and references/output-spec.md. Keep summaries short, commands copyable, machine state stable, and scientific/comparability changes explicit. ANNOTATED_README.md must preserve the source README byte-for-byte outside inserted evidence blocks and pass its strip/check round trip. Use --source-adjacent-readme only for an owned RIGORPILOT_README.md; never replace an unrelated file. Distinguish verified facts from inference.

Reference Loading

  • Workflow judgment: references/agent-operating-principles.md.
  • Human-readable output: references/language-policy.md.
  • Scientific/comparability judgment: references/research-rigor-principles.md and, when experiment details matter, references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md.
  • Protocol-sensitive changes: references/research-safety-principles.md and references/patch-policy.md.
  • Personal rigor and lessons are advisory only; keep specialized detail in references/scripts rather than expanding this entrypoint.

Más skills de lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish. The text is a description of a skill. We must preserve the name "ai-research-explore" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. Also preserve technical terms like "Rigor Explore", "SOTA", "README", etc. The text includes a slug reference "Rigor Explore compatible skill slug" - we should translate that but keep "Rigor Explore" as is. Also "current_research" and "explore_outputs/" should be preserved as they are likely code references. The instruction says to preserve URLs, numbers, technical terms. So we keep "SOTA", "README", "current_research", "explore_outputs/". Also "task family", "dataset", "benchmark", "evaluation method" are technical but can be translated. "idea gating" might be a term - we can translate as "filtrado de ideas" or keep? Probably translate. "fair comparison" -> "comparación justa". "governed experiments
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Habilidad de solo lectura de Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit para repositorios de investigación de aprendizaje profundo. Úsala cuando el usuario quiera leer y comprender un repositorio, inspeccionar la estructura del modelo y los puntos de entrada de entrenamiento o inferencia, revisar configuraciones y puntos de inserción, o señalar patrones de implementación sospechosos sin modificar código ni ejecutar tareas pesadas. No la uses para ejecución activa de comandos, refactorización amplia, adaptación especulativa de código o corrección automática de errores.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish, preserving the name "explore-code" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-code" does not appear in the source text. So we just translate the text. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has technical terms like "leaf skill", "auditable candidate implementation", "deep learning research repositories", "LoRA", "adapter layers", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". We need to keep those as is or translate appropriately? The instruction says "preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." So technical terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "rollback-aware records" should be kept in English? Or translate? Usually technical terms are kept in English, but "leaf skill" might be
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish. The text describes a skill called "minimal-run-and-audit" but the instruction says to preserve the name only if it appears in the source text. The name "minimal-run-and-audit" does not appear in the source text; the source text mentions "Rigor Run skill" but that's different. So we should not include the name. We just translate the text inside <text>. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has "README-first", "repro_outputs/", "patch notes", etc. We need to keep those as is or translate appropriately? "README-first" is a term, likely keep as is. "repro_outputs/" is a directory name, keep as is. "patch notes" might be translated as "notas de parche" but it's a technical term, could keep as "patch notes" or translate. The instruction says "preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Habilidad de configuración Rigor para la reproducción de repositorios de deep learning con enfoque README-first. Úsala cuando la tarea sea específicamente preparar un entorno conservador basado en conda, suposiciones de rutas de checkpoints y datasets, sugerencias de ubicación de caché y notas de configuración antes de cualquier ejecución en un repositorio documentado con README. No la uses para escaneo de repositorios, orquestación completa, interpretación de artículos, informes de ejecución final ni configuración genérica de entorno que no esté vinculada a un objetivo de reproducción específico.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish. The text describes a skill called "explore-run" but the instruction says to preserve the name if it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" appears in the text? Actually, the text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - the name is "explore-run" but it's not explicitly written as a separate name. The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run" but the source text does not contain "explore-run" as a standalone term. It contains "Rigor Explore run leaf skill". Possibly the name is part of the description. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should translate the entire text as is, preserving any product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The name "explore-run" does not appear in the source text, so we don't need to include it. However, "Rigor Improve" and "R
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Habilidad de Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit para trabajo de investigación en deep learning. Úsala cuando el usuario pegue un traceback, error de terminal, CUDA OOM, fallo de carga de checkpoint, desajuste de formas, síntoma de pérdida NaN o fallo de entrenamiento y desee un diagnóstico conservador antes de cualquier parche, con correcciones de depuración claramente separadas de las contribuciones de investigación. No usar para refactorización amplia, adaptación especulativa, parches exploratorios automáticos o familiarización general con el repositorio.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Ayudante de contexto de Paper Rigor para la reproducción de repositorios de deep learning con enfoque README-first. Úsese solo cuando el README y los archivos del repositorio dejen un vacío estrecho y crítico para la reproducción, y la tarea sea resolver un detalle específico del artículo, como división del conjunto de datos, preprocesamiento, protocolo de evaluación, mapeo de puntos de control o suposición de tiempo de ejecución a partir de fuentes primarias del artículo, registrando conflictos. No usar para resumen general del artículo, escaneo del repositorio, configuración del entorno, ejecución de comandos, búsqueda de artículos solo por título, o...
researchdocumentdata-analysis