ai-research-reproduction

Orquestador en modo de reproducción de RigorPilot para la reproducción de repositorios de aprendizaje profundo con enfoque README-first. Úsalo cuando el usuario desee un flujo integral y de mínima confianza que primero lea el repositorio, seleccione el objetivo de inferencia o evaluación documentado más pequeño, coordine la ingesta, configuración, ejecución confiable, entrenamiento confiable opcional, análisis de repositorio opcional y resolución opcional de brechas en el artículo, aplique reglas conservadoras de parches, registre evidencia, suposiciones, desviaciones y puntos de decisión humana,...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Guide README-first deep learning reproduction toward a minimal trustworthy run with auditable evidence. Reproduction is not "make it run by changing anything"; faithfully read the README, environment, weights, datasets, and documented commands, then record results and deviations. Start with references/agent-operating-principles.md; load references/research-rigor-principles.md and references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when scientific meaning or experiment details are at stake.

For first-use problems, run scripts/doctor.py with the intended Python (read-only; optional --repo and --require-module). The deterministic entrypoint is scripts/orchestrate_repro.py with a self-contained _bundled/ runtime, so this skill works when installed alone; separately installed companion skills remain optional reusable entrypoints. Use the entrypoint and --help for routine runs; inspect its implementation when a concrete blocker or safety question requires it. Executed commands persist lifecycle state, append-only events, and full streamed stdout/stderr under repro_outputs/_runtime/<run_id>/. A CANCEL file in the active run directory requests process-tree cancellation. For recovery, queues or model gates, read references/runtime-and-model-adapter.md; for the optional model/tool loop, read references/agent-runner.md and use scripts/run_agent.py.

Fit

Use this skill when all are true:

  • The target is an AI code repository with a README, scripts, configs, or documented commands.
  • The request spans multiple trusted phases such as intake, setup, execution, training verification, analysis, paper-gap resolution, and reporting.
  • The desired result is a small reproducible target, not broad experimentation.

Do not use this skill for paper summaries, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, open-ended research design, or explicit candidate-only exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Read the README and nearby repo signals.
  2. Run the bundled repo-intake-and-plan stage to extract commands and targets.
  3. Select and justify the minimum trustworthy target.
  4. Run env-and-assets-bootstrap only for target-specific environment, checkpoint, dataset, and cache assumptions.
  5. Run analyze-project only when structure, insertion points, or suspicious implementation patterns need read-only clarification.
  6. Use minimal-run-and-audit for documented inference, evaluation, smoke, or sanity execution. Keep direct execution as the default; native shell syntax requires explicit review and authorization.
  7. Use run-train instead when the selected trusted target is training startup, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume.
  8. Pause for human review before fuller training claims or any change that could alter dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or result interpretation.
  9. Award result-match only when explicit expected metrics are compared under a recorded tolerance; observed metrics alone prove execution, not reproduction. Then write the standardized outputs and a concise final note in the user's language when practical.
  10. Once the requested target and evidence checks are complete, return the bounded result and stop. Optional stages and further README commands are not automatic follow-up work.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
ANNOTATED_README.md   # original README + colored per-section agent-action annotations
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and the field rules in references/output-spec.md.

  • Put the shortest high-value summary in SUMMARY.md.
  • Put copyable commands in COMMANDS.md.
  • Put process evidence, assumptions, failures, and decisions in LOG.md.
  • Put scientific meaning and change effects in SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md.
  • Put comparison anchors and protocol deviations in COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md.
  • Put durable machine-readable state in status.json.
  • Put branch, commit, validation, and README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md when needed.
  • Put the researcher's at-a-glance view in ANNOTATED_README.md: the README replayed byte-for-byte—including its image, GIF, video, and HTML markup—with exactly one marked color annotation after every heading block. Never extract a text-only surrogate. Generation must pass the built-in strip/check round trip before the file is kept.
  • For original relative media/file context, use --source-adjacent-readme to also write RIGORPILOT_README.md beside the source README; inspect the reported path/status and never replace an unrelated existing file. See references/output-spec.md.
  • Distinguish verified facts from inferred guesses.

Reference Loading

  • Load references/language-policy.md when writing human-readable outputs.
  • Load references/research-rigor-principles.md before making comparability, contribution, or research-result claims.
  • Load references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when dataset, split, metric, checkpoint, training, or evaluation details matter.
  • Consult ~/.rigorpilot/PERSONAL_RIGOR.md if present, under references/continuous-learning-policy.md (advisory only; core wins).
  • Failed and later-resolved runs are auto-recorded as lessons via shared/scripts/lessons_store.py (RIGORPILOT_LESSONS=0 disables).
  • Load references/research-safety-principles.md before protocol-sensitive decisions.
  • Load references/patch-policy.md before modifying repository files.
  • Keep specialized logic in sub-skills, scripts, templates, or references rather than expanding this entrypoint.

Más skills de lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish. The text is a description of a skill. We must preserve the name "ai-research-explore" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. Also preserve technical terms like "Rigor Explore", "SOTA", "README", etc. The text includes a slug reference "Rigor Explore compatible skill slug" - we should translate that but keep "Rigor Explore" as is. Also "current_research" and "explore_outputs/" should be preserved as they are likely code references. The instruction says to preserve URLs, numbers, technical terms. So we keep "SOTA", "README", "current_research", "explore_outputs/". Also "task family", "dataset", "benchmark", "evaluation method" are technical but can be translated. "idea gating" might be a term - we can translate as "filtrado de ideas" or keep? Probably translate. "fair comparison" -> "comparación justa". "governed experiments
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Habilidad de solo lectura de Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit para repositorios de investigación de aprendizaje profundo. Úsala cuando el usuario quiera leer y comprender un repositorio, inspeccionar la estructura del modelo y los puntos de entrada de entrenamiento o inferencia, revisar configuraciones y puntos de inserción, o señalar patrones de implementación sospechosos sin modificar código ni ejecutar tareas pesadas. No la uses para ejecución activa de comandos, refactorización amplia, adaptación especulativa de código o corrección automática de errores.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish, preserving the name "explore-code" if it appears. The text is a description of an agent skill. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-code" does not appear in the source text. So we just translate the text. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has technical terms like "leaf skill", "auditable candidate implementation", "deep learning research repositories", "LoRA", "adapter layers", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research". We need to keep those as is or translate appropriately? The instruction says "preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms." So technical terms like "LoRA", "adapter layers", "rollback-aware records" should be kept in English? Or translate? Usually technical terms are kept in English, but "leaf skill" might be
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish. The text describes a skill called "minimal-run-and-audit" but the instruction says to preserve the name only if it appears in the source text. The name "minimal-run-and-audit" does not appear in the source text; the source text mentions "Rigor Run skill" but that's different. So we should not include the name. We just translate the text inside <text>. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text has "README-first", "repro_outputs/", "patch notes", etc. We need to keep those as is or translate appropriately? "README-first" is a term, likely keep as is. "repro_outputs/" is a directory name, keep as is. "patch notes" might be translated as "notas de parche" but it's a technical term, could keep as "patch notes" or translate. The instruction says "preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Habilidad de configuración Rigor para la reproducción de repositorios de deep learning con enfoque README-first. Úsala cuando la tarea sea específicamente preparar un entorno conservador basado en conda, suposiciones de rutas de checkpoints y datasets, sugerencias de ubicación de caché y notas de configuración antes de cualquier ejecución en un repositorio documentado con README. No la uses para escaneo de repositorios, orquestación completa, interpretación de artículos, informes de ejecución final ni configuración genérica de entorno que no esté vinculada a un objetivo de reproducción específico.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish. The text describes a skill called "explore-run" but the instruction says to preserve the name if it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" appears in the text? Actually, the text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - the name is "explore-run" but it's not explicitly written as a separate name. The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run" but the source text does not contain "explore-run" as a standalone term. It contains "Rigor Explore run leaf skill". Possibly the name is part of the description. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should translate the entire text as is, preserving any product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The name "explore-run" does not appear in the source text, so we don't need to include it. However, "Rigor Improve" and "R
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Habilidad de Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit para trabajo de investigación en deep learning. Úsala cuando el usuario pegue un traceback, error de terminal, CUDA OOM, fallo de carga de checkpoint, desajuste de formas, síntoma de pérdida NaN o fallo de entrenamiento y desee un diagnóstico conservador antes de cualquier parche, con correcciones de depuración claramente separadas de las contribuciones de investigación. No usar para refactorización amplia, adaptación especulativa, parches exploratorios automáticos o familiarización general con el repositorio.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Ayudante de contexto de Paper Rigor para la reproducción de repositorios de deep learning con enfoque README-first. Úsese solo cuando el README y los archivos del repositorio dejen un vacío estrecho y crítico para la reproducción, y la tarea sea resolver un detalle específico del artículo, como división del conjunto de datos, preprocesamiento, protocolo de evaluación, mapeo de puntos de control o suposición de tiempo de ejecución a partir de fuentes primarias del artículo, registrando conflictos. No usar para resumen general del artículo, escaneo del repositorio, configuración del entorno, ejecución de comandos, búsqueda de artículos solo por título, o...
researchdocumentdata-analysis