bitwarden-workflow-linter-rules

prefijo_del_entorno_de_trabajo

npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill bitwarden-workflow-linter-rules

Mechanical Rules — apply automatically

name_capitalized

  • Trigger: A workflow-level or job-level name: value does not start with a capital letter.
  • Fix: Capitalize the first character of the name value. Do not change anything else.

permissions_exist

  • Trigger: A workflow or job is missing an explicit permissions: key.
  • Fix: Add permissions: {} at the workflow level if all jobs are missing it, or at the individual job level if only some jobs are missing it. Prefer job-level permissions.

pinned_job_runner

  • Trigger: A job's runs-on: uses an unpinned label.
  • Fix: Replace with the current pinned equivalent:
    • ubuntu-latest → ubuntu-24.04
    • windows-latest → windows-2022
    • macos-latest → macos-14

step_pinned

Bitwarden enforces two distinct pinning requirements depending on who owns the action. Steps with no uses: field and local actions (starting with ./) are skipped entirely.

  • Trigger (internal actions): A uses: reference starting with bitwarden/ is not pinned to @main. Exception: references of the form bitwarden/sm-action[/path]@<any-ref> are compliant at any ref and never trigger this rule.

  • Trigger (external actions): A uses: reference not starting with bitwarden/ is not pinned to a full 40-character commit SHA, or is missing an inline version comment.

  • Fix (internal actions):

    • Change the ref to @main (e.g., bitwarden/gh-actions/azure-login@v1 → bitwarden/gh-actions/azure-login@main)
    • Do not resolve a SHA — @main is the required and compliant state.
  • Fix (external actions):

    1. Resolve the correct commit SHA via the GitHub API: gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{ref} --jq '.sha'
    2. Show the SHA and a verification link (https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/commit/{sha}) to the user before applying.
    3. Wait for the user to confirm the SHA. If they provide a different SHA, use that instead.
    4. Replace the uses: value with {action}@{sha} and add a comment with the original tag: # {original-ref}
    • Example: uses: actions/checkout@v4 → uses: actions/checkout@11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683 # v4

underscore_outputs

  • Trigger: A multi-word output name in a $GITHUB_OUTPUT write or outputs: block uses hyphens or camelCase instead of underscores.
  • Fix: Rename the output key to use underscores. Update all references to that output within the same file.

job_environment_prefix

  • Trigger: An environment variable name at the job level does not follow SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE.
  • Fix: Rename to SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE and update all usages within the job.

check_pr_target

  • Trigger: A workflow using pull_request_target has jobs not restricted to the default branch.
  • Fix: Add a condition to the affected jobs: if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/<default-branch>'. Determine the repo's default branch rather than assuming main. If the job already has an if: condition, combine with && (e.g., if: <existing-condition> && github.ref == 'refs/heads/<default-branch>').

Judgment Rules — pause and ask the user

name_exists

  • Trigger: A workflow or job is missing a name: key entirely.
  • Fix: Ask the user what name to use, then add a name: key at the correct level with a capitalized value.

step_approved

  • Trigger: A step's uses: references an action not on the Bitwarden approved actions list.
  • Options to present to the user:
    1. Add to approved list — if the action is legitimate and has been reviewed and approved, add it to bitwarden/workflow-linter's approved actions config.
    2. Replace — swap with an approved alternative that provides the same functionality.
    3. Remove — delete the step if it is not essential.
  • Do not make this change automatically. Show the unapproved action name, ask which option the user wants, then act.

run_actionlint (complex findings)

  • Trigger: actionlint reports an error that is not a simple formatting issue (e.g., type mismatches in expressions, invalid context references, shell script errors).
  • Action: Show the finding verbatim, suggest a fix based on actionlint's message, and ask the user to confirm before applying.
  • Simple actionlint findings (e.g., shellcheck style warnings with a clear single-line fix) may be applied automatically.

Más skills de bitwarden

figma-to-angular
bitwarden
Esta habilidad convierte una especificación de diseño de Figma en un componente Angular completamente implementado con historias de Storybook en el monorepo de Bitwarden Clients. El resultado debe coincidir visualmente con el diseño, siguiendo todas las convenciones del código base.
force-multiplier
bitwarden
Aplica una única intención a muchos objetivos a la vez — una flota de repositorios en el ecosistema Bitwarden, o muchos proyectos dentro de un monorepo — como N consistentes,…
analyzing-git-sessions
bitwarden
Analiza los commits y cambios de git dentro de un período de tiempo o rango de commits, proporcionando resúmenes estructurados para revisión de código, retrospectivas, registros de trabajo o sesiones…
coordinating-cross-team-breakdown
bitwarden
Coordinar la revisión y aprobación entre equipos para un desglose técnico de Bitwarden. Úsalo al identificar equipos afectados, construir la tabla de aprobación de la Parte 3, dar seguimiento…
assessing-jira-issue-relevance
bitwarden
Úsalo cuando el usuario proporcione una única clave de incidencia de Jira y pregunte si sigue siendo relevante, sigue siendo aplicable, sigue pendiente, sigue siendo un bug, se ha corregido o puede…
assessing-test-coverage
bitwarden
Úsese para determinar qué cobertura de pruebas YA existe para un cambio específico (un PR, clave de Jira, documento Tech Breakdown, CSV de Testmo, rutas modificadas o elementos nombrados…
retrospecting
bitwarden
Realiza un análisis exhaustivo de las sesiones de Claude Code, examinando el historial de git, los registros de conversación, los cambios de código y recopilando comentarios de los usuarios para generar…
reviewing-incremental-changes
bitwarden
Usa esta habilidad al volver a revisar un PR que ya tiene comentarios o al responder a cambios del desarrollador después de la revisión inicial. Aplica cuando existan hilos de PR o…