exploring-replay-vision-observations

Guides agents through pulling a Replay Vision scanner's observations, reading the findings, and acting on them — summarizing patterns across sessions, drilling…

npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/ai-plugin --skill exploring-replay-vision-observations

Exploring Replay Vision observations

A scanner is a standing LLM probe over session recordings; each time it runs against a session it records one observation. This skill is about the other half of the loop — reading what the scanners have found and doing something useful with it. For creating or sizing scanners, use [[creating-replay-vision-scanners]].

Mental model

  • Scanner → observations. One observation = one scan of one session. There is at most one observation per (scanner, session).
  • The finding lives in scanner_result. Its shape depends on the scanner's scanner_type, but it always carries a confidence:
    • monitor → a verdict (yes / no / inconclusive) plus an open-ended observation.
    • classifier → one or more tags from the scanner's label set.
    • scorer → a numeric score on the scanner's scale.
    • summarizer → a free-text summary (optionally with facet embeddings).
  • Only succeeded observations carry a finding. Triage the rest by status/error_reason (see below).
  • Observations are LLM judgments, not ground truth. One observation is one model's read of one session — corroborate before you act on it.

If a scanner has emits_signals: true, its observations also feed the Signals pipeline and may surface as Inbox signal reports (clusters of related findings). When the user's intent is "work the reports", that's the inbox path — see Acting on findings below.

Step 1 — Anchor on the scanner

If the user gave a /project/<id>/replay-vision/<scanner-id> URL, that path segment is the scanner ID. Otherwise list them with vision-scanners-list and pick the relevant one.

Then call vision-scanners-get to read its configuration before reading results — the scanner_type and scanner_config.prompt tell you how to interpret scanner_result (a verdict field only makes sense once you know it's a monitor; a score only means something against the scorer's scale).

Step 2 — Pull the observations

Pick the axis that matches the question:

  • What has this scanner found, over time?vision-scanners-observations-list (the workhorse). Filter to status=succeeded to get only sessions with a finding, then narrow by verdict (monitors) or tags (classifiers). Scorers aren't filtered by score — rank them with order_by=-result_score instead. Use order_by (e.g. -result_score, -completed_at) to surface the strongest hits first.
  • What did every scanner find about one session?vision-observations-list (the session_id query parameter is REQUIRED). Use this while investigating a single recording.
  • The full detail of one findingvision-scanners-observations-get or vision-observations-retrieve — returns the frozen scanner_snapshot (config at run time) and the complete scanner_result, including any event citations that link the finding back to specific events in the recording.

Triage status so you don't mistake a non-result for "nothing wrong":

statusmeaningtypical error_reason
succeededhas a scanner_result
ineligiblesession couldn't be analysed — a normal outcome, not an errortoo_short, no_recording, too_inactive, too_long, no_events
failedthe scan erroredprovider_rejected, validation_failed, rasterization_failed, provider_transient, internal_error
pending / runningstill in flight

A scanner that looks like it "found nothing" is often producing mostly ineligible observations — check the mix before concluding.

Step 3 — Read the findings

  • Monitors: focus on verdict: yes; treat inconclusive as a weak signal. The observation text is the substance.
  • Classifiers: group by tags to see the distribution of what's happening across sessions.
  • Scorers: look at the tails (highest/lowest scores), not just the average.
  • Summarizers: read for recurring themes across summaries.

Weight by confidence, and don't over-index on a single observation. To understand a specific hit, take its session_id and either cross-reference other scanners (vision-observations-list) or drill into the actual recording with the [[investigating-replay]] skill and the session-recording MCP tools.

To test a scanner's lens against a specific session that doesn't have an observation yet, trigger one on demand with vision-scanners-scan-session — it's async (minutes; rasterising the recording + the LLM call are slow) and, like all observations, runs at most once per (scanner, session).

Step 4 — Act on the findings

Match the action to the user's intent, and corroborate before you create work:

  • Summarize a pattern. Report the finding back with the numbers and a few representative session_ids (e.g. "12 of 40 succeeded observations flagged checkout confusion; sessions A, B, C"). Cite, don't assert.
  • Make it trackable. When a finding is corroborated across several sessions (not one low-confidence hit), capture it durably with the tools that exist: create an insight or notebook to track its frequency, bundle the supporting recordings into a session-recording playlist so a human can watch the evidence, and add an annotation if it marks a regression. There is no MCP tool to open a PostHog task directly — to route a finding into tracked work, use the Inbox path below (for signal-emitting scanners) or hand the summary to a human or coding agent to act on. Group by distinct issue, not per observation.
  • Work the Inbox. If the scanner emits signals, its findings may already be clustered into signal reports — read and act on those with inbox-reports-list + inbox-report-artefacts-list (the report's work log is the evidence). See the [[inbox-exploration]] skill; that path also records your work against the report.

The discipline that matters: a single observation is one model's judgment on one recording. Confirm a finding reproduces across observations (or against the raw recording) before turning it into a task, an alert, or a claim — the same rigor the signals pipeline applies before it promotes observations to a report.

Gotchas

  • Only succeeded observations have a scanner_result — everything else is triage metadata.
  • ineligiblefailed. Ineligible is a normal terminal outcome (e.g. the recording was too short), not a bug to chase.
  • One observation per (scanner, session) — re-scanning a session that already has any observation (even ineligible/failed) is a no-op.
  • Findings are snapshotted. Each observation keeps the scanner_snapshot it ran under, so older observations may reflect a previous prompt/config (scanner_version).
  • Quota is shared. On-demand scans count against the org's monthly budget — check vision-quota-retrieve before triggering a batch of them.