doca-upgrade
Use this skill when the user is contemplating a DOCA upgrade or downgrade — moving a host to a newer DOCA release, refreshing the BlueField BFB, bumping the…
npx skills add https://github.com/nvidia/skills --skill doca-upgradeDOCA upgrade
Where to start: This skill is the bundle's single source of
truth for the discipline that wraps a DOCA upgrade or downgrade.
Open TASKS.md when the user wants to do something
with an upgrade (detect the gap, ask for confirmation, walk the
guided upgrade, verify it, or diagnose a failed one); open
CAPABILITIES.md when the question is what does
an upgrade even cover (the host apt-upgrade vs BFB reflash vs
container-tag bump vs downgrade/rollback modes, the never-auto rule,
the confirmation gate, the sunset-awareness concern, the error
taxonomy, and the upgrade-specific safety overlay).
For a planned move, the single most important rule this skill
exists to enforce is detect → report → ASK → only-then guided
upgrade. Never upgrade automatically. The skill detects the
installed DOCA env and what newer release is available, reports the
gap clearly, then STOPS and asks the user for explicit confirmation.
Only on an explicit "yes" does it walk a guided upgrade. A failed or
partial move instead enters the recovery ladder without presenting a
new target move. In both paths every hardware / firmware / reboot
step is delegated to
doca-hardware-safety, never
redefined here. Version detection itself is owned by
doca-version; this skill routes there
and does not restate the detection chain.
Example questions this skill answers well
The CLASSES of upgrade questions this skill is built to answer, each with one worked example. The agent should treat the class as the load-bearing piece — the worked example is a single instance.
- "Is there a newer DOCA than what I have, and how far behind am
I?" — worked example: "
pkg-config --modversion doca-commonsays 3.1.0; what's current and what does moving cost me?". Answered by the detect-and-report-the-gap workflow inTASKS.md ## configure, which routes the detection todoca-versionand the what is current lookup todoca-public-knowledge-map. - "Should I just run
apt upgradeto move to the next DOCA release?" — worked example: "I want the newest Flow features; can I upgrade in place right now?". Answered by the never-auto rule and the confirmation gate inCAPABILITIES.md ## Safety policyplus the ask-before-acting step inTASKS.md ## run— the agent reports the gap and STOPS for explicit confirmation before any upgrade command runs. - "My upgrade left the host on a different release than the
BlueField — what happened?" — worked example: "after the
upgrade
pkg-configsays 3.3.0 butbfverstill says 3.1.0". Answered by the host/BFB-skew row inCAPABILITIES.md ## Error taxonomyand the failed-upgrade diagnosis inTASKS.md ## debug, which re-routes the detection todoca-version ## test. - "The upgrade aborted half-way and now
dpkgis wedged — how do I recover?" — worked example: "apt upgradewas interrupted;dpkgreports an interrupted transaction". Answered by the partial-upgrade and aborted-transaction rows inCAPABILITIES.md ## Error taxonomyplus the recovery ladder inTASKS.md ## debug. - "The upgrade needs me to reflash the BFB / flip BlueField mode /
reboot — is that safe?" — worked example: "the target release
requires a new BFB; can I reflash now?". Answered by routing
every hardware / firmware / reboot step to
doca-hardware-safetyviaTASKS.md ## run; this skill never redefines the reflash, mode-flip, or cold-power-cycle discipline. - "My installed component is being sunset — should I keep building
on it or move?" — worked example: "I rely on DOCA App Shield /
the DOCA Flow Inspector service; are they on a
deprecation track?". Answered by the sunset / deprecation
awareness concern in
CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes, which routes the user to the public release notes viadoca-public-knowledge-mapto confirm lifecycle status rather than recommending continued investment in a component that may be sunsetting.
When to load this skill
Load this skill whenever an upgrade or downgrade of DOCA is the
load-bearing concern — the user is asking whether a newer release
exists, whether to move to it, how to move safely, or how to recover
a move that went wrong. The decision must be made before the
agent composes its first sentence; the activation checklist below is
mirrored here so the activation rule is at hand whenever this skill
is consulted. For a planned upgrade or downgrade, it reports the gap
and then STOPS for explicit user confirmation. For a failed or partial
upgrade, it enters TASKS.md ## debug first to
capture and stabilize the current state; it never uses another
upgrade command as the first recovery action, retries the move, or
issues a new upgrade command without explicit confirmation.
Agent activation checklist — load this skill at the START of the answer when any cell below is true
| Trigger class | Concrete prompt-side signals (any one fires the overlay) |
|---|---|
| Upgrade / downgrade intent | "is there a newer DOCA", "should I move to the next release", "upgrade me to the latest", "roll me back to the previous DOCA", "downgrade to 3.1 for a bug repro" |
| Accidental / drifted upgrade | "apt upgrade pulled a newer DOCA point release and broke my build", "my host and BlueField are on different releases now", *"the source channel is latest and I didn't mean to move" * |
| Failed / partial upgrade | "the upgrade aborted half-way", "dpkg is wedged after an interrupted transaction", "upgrade finished but the four-way match no longer holds" |
| Container tag bump | the user wants to move an NGC DOCA container deployment from one tag to a newer one, or asks whether bumping the tag is an upgrade |
| Sunset / deprecation awareness | the user asks whether the component they depend on is deprecated, being sunset, or worth continued investment |
First classify the request. A planned move (including a requested
rollback) follows detect → report → ASK. A failed, partial, or
accidentally drifted move is already a diagnosis/recovery request:
load this skill, capture the current four-source state, and enter
TASKS.md ## debug; do not ask for permission to perform an upgrade
that has already failed, and do not issue another upgrade command as
the first recovery action.
For a planned move, the agent MUST:
- Route planned-upgrade version detection to
doca-version ## configure. For failed or partial upgrades, start withdoca-version ## debugandTASKS.md ## debug. Do NOT restate the four-source detection chain here; this skill consumes the detected state and four-way match status. - Report the gap and STOP for explicit confirmation. Present
the installed release, the available target release, and what
moving costs (per
CAPABILITIES.md ## Version compatibility), then ask the user to confirm. Do NOT proceed to any upgrade command until the user explicitly says yes. - Route every hardware / firmware / reboot step to
doca-hardware-safety. This skill names when such a step is part of the upgrade; that skill names how it is applied safely.
For a failed/partial move, the agent MUST instead classify the
captured state against
CAPABILITIES.md ## Error taxonomy,
delegate the single documented corrective action, and re-enter the
recovery ladder. Any unsupported installed → target jump fails
closed: do not improvise intermediate releases or commands; require
an upgrade path explicitly documented by the Compatibility Policy or
release notes.
Do not load this skill for first-time install (use
doca-setup), for the version-detection
chain in isolation (use doca-version),
or for general orientation (use
doca-public-knowledge-map).
What this skill provides
This is a thin loader. The body keeps only the orientation needed to pick the right next file. The substantive upgrade material lives in two companion files:
CAPABILITIES.md— the upgrade surface: the upgrade-mode taxonomy (host apt upgrade vs BFB reflash vs container-tag bump vs downgrade/rollback), the never-auto rule and the confirmation gate, the sunset / deprecation-awareness concern, the version-compatibility overlay that redirects todoca-version, the error taxonomy (partial upgrade, apt-source drift, host/BFB skew, aborted transaction /dpkginterrupted), the observability surface (which commands prove the upgrade did or did not happen), and the upgrade-specific safety overlay on top ofdoca-hardware-safety.TASKS.md— step-by-step workflows for the in-scope verbs:configure(detect + discover target + apt-source precheck),buildandmodify(routing stubs — the version-pin change is owned elsewhere),run(the confirmation-gated guided upgrade),test(post-upgrade four-way verification),debug(diagnose a failed / partial upgrade), plus aDeferred task verbsblock.
Loading order
- Read this
SKILL.mdfirst to confirm the user's question is in scope (an upgrade / downgrade is being contemplated or recovered). - For the upgrade-mode taxonomy, the never-auto rule, the sunset-awareness concern, the error taxonomy, observability, and the safety overlay, see CAPABILITIES.md.
- For step-by-step workflows — detect-and-report, the confirmation-gated guided upgrade, post-upgrade verification, and failed-upgrade diagnosis — see TASKS.md.
Related skills
doca-version— owns the four-source detection chain and the four-way match rule. This skill's detect step routes there and does not redefine version detection; the gap report consumes the detected version.doca-setup— owns first-time install, install verification, and the apt-source path. This skill's apt-source consistency precheck cross-links there before anyapt-shaped upgrade is contemplated.doca-hardware-safety— owns every hardware / firmware / reboot step (mlxconfig, BFB reflash, BlueField mode flip, cold power cycle). This skill's## Safety policyoverlays that meta-policy and adds only the upgrade-specific surface (confirmation gate, rollback-first, maintenance window).doca-public-knowledge-map— the routing table to public DOCA docs, including the release notes and the Compatibility Policy. This skill routes what is the current release and is this component sunsetting there; it does not duplicate the routing.doca-debug— the cross-cutting debug ladder. A failed upgrade whose residual symptom lives at a software layer hands off there once the upgrade state is known.doca-programming-guide— the build pattern a consumer rebuilds against after an upgrade. This skill surfaces that a rebuild may be needed; the build mechanics live there.doca-structured-tools-contract— the JSON schemas the agent prefers when present; the upgrade detect step reuses the samedoca-envone-shot the version skill uses, when the host has it.