evaluating-sdk-internal-updates

Evaluates a bitwarden/android "Update SDK to" PR against the sdk-internal commit range for compile-time and runtime breaking changes, maps affected symbols to…

npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/android --skill evaluating-sdk-internal-updates

Evaluating sdk-internal Updates

Identify both compile-time and runtime breaks before fixing anything — fixing the first break found is not finishing. Steps 3-7 always cover the entire commit range before step 8 starts, no matter how obvious or urgent an early compile-time break looks.

Identify

Binding surface facts specific to this SDK: #[uniffi::export] / derive(uniffi::...) annotations are scattered across many crates, not just crates/bitwarden-uniffi; crates/bitwarden-ffi is unrelated ("do not use"). No .udl files. UniFFI emits one Kotlin package per crate (com.bitwarden.core, com.bitwarden.vault, com.bitwarden.crypto, etc.) — only the top-level Client/AuthClient/GeneratorClients actually live under com.bitwarden.sdk. Both app and authenticator depend on the SDK; neither is optional to search.

A hunk that only touches a macro invocation (e.g. state_bridge! { ... }) doesn't show the binding surface — the expansion lives in the macro's definition, often in a different crate (e.g. bitwarden-state-bridge-macro). #[uniffi::export(with_foreign)] marks a callback interface: a trait Kotlin must implement, where adding a field/method is never additive-safe for the implementor.

  1. Locate the local bitwarden/sdk-internal clone (check sibling directories to this repo). If none exists, stop and tell the user it's a required prerequisite for this skill — do not clone it yourself.
  2. gh pr diff <PR> -R bitwarden/android | grep bitwardenSdk → old/new bitwardenSdk string. Everything after the second - is the git ref — a commit SHA or a branch name (.dev SDK builds use both); resolve a branch name as origin/<branch> in the clone.
  3. Attempt ./gradlew app:compileStandardDebugKotlin authenticator:compileDebugKotlin at the current checkout before crawling sdk-internal. A failure confirms a compile-time break directly, with a more precise location than any git search — note it and continue to steps 4-7 for the full commit range; do not fix it yet. A clean build only rules out compile-time breaks, not runtime ones.
  4. git -C <sdk-internal-path> log --oneline OLD..NEW -G'uniffi::export|derive\(uniffi|#\[uniffi' -- '*.rs' → candidate binding-surface commits.
  5. Classify per hunk, not per commit — a commit with one additive headline change can still have a second, unrelated breaking hunk. If a hunk only touches a macro invocation, read the macro's definition before classifying. git -C <sdk-internal-path> show <sha> -- '*.rs'.
  6. For every distinct symbol/type touched (every hunk, not just the commit's headline change), grep the whole repo for the bare symbol name to find Android call sites — a fixed module list or a com.bitwarden.sdk.<Symbol> import-prefix check both miss real consumers.
  7. Report: compile-time breaks, runtime breaks, safe/no-call-site — each with commit, symbol, and call sites. Cite sdk-internal commits and PRs as bitwarden/sdk-internal#<NNN> or a full commit URL/SHA — never a bare #<NNN> copied from a commit subject line. A bare reference auto-links within whatever repo the report is posted to (e.g. bitwarden/android), tagging an unrelated issue or PR there.

Resolve

Resolve the findings from Step 7 by deciding on a fix (step 8), implementing and committing it directly (step 9), then verifying (step 10).

  1. Decide the fix for anything found, compile-time or runtime, whenever the correct behavior is clear and within scope. For a new required method, grep for the underlying concept, not the new method/type name (it won't exist yet) — no existing consumer means stub it: a // no-op comment or a null/default return that satisfies the compiler, not a behavioral decision. Never TODO() — it throws at runtime, which is a crash, not a stub. A sibling's structure (naming, placement, style) is a template; its behavior (storage, defaulting, error handling, side effects) is not evidence for yours. If unsure, report it instead of guessing, along with anything needing a product decision.
  2. Implement every fix from step 8 directly: invoke Skill(implementing-android-code) first if the fix isn't purely mechanical, then commit with Skill(bitwarden-delivery-tools:committing-changes).
  3. Verify with the same compile task used in step 3.

More skills from bitwarden

figma-to-angular
bitwarden
This skill turns a Figma design spec into a fully implemented Angular component with Storybook stories in the Bitwarden Clients monorepo. The output should match the design visually while following all codebase conventions.
force-multiplier
bitwarden
Apply one intent across many targets at once — a fleet of repositories across the Bitwarden ecosystem, or many projects inside a monorepo — as N consistent,…
analyzing-git-sessions
bitwarden
Analyzes git commits and changes within a timeframe or commit range, providing structured summaries for code review, retrospectives, work logs, or session…
coordinating-cross-team-breakdown
bitwarden
Coordinate cross-team review and signoff for a Bitwarden Tech Breakdown. Use when identifying affected teams, building the Part 3 signoff table, chasing…
assessing-jira-issue-relevance
bitwarden
Use when the user provides a single Jira issue key and asks whether it is still relevant, still applicable, still pending, still a bug, has been fixed, or can…
assessing-test-coverage
bitwarden
Use when determining what test coverage ALREADY exists for a specific change (a PR, Jira key, Tech Breakdown doc, Testmo CSV, changed paths, or named…
retrospecting
bitwarden
Performs comprehensive analysis of Claude Code sessions, examining git history, conversation logs, code changes, and gathering user feedback to generate…
reviewing-incremental-changes
bitwarden
Use this skill when re-reviewing a PR that already has comments or when responding to developer changes after initial review. Apply when PR threads exist or…